Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Context & explanation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Context & explanation
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

7 experts · 83 posts · 1d ago
Colin Mary Branscombe Doll Matt Darling Singularity's Bounty e/cc Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦 growth.wtf
Matches Context & explanation
“... the context, and merges said latent concepts into the subsequent FFN (add + norm rather than replacement). As you approach the final FFN layers, the main work of the FFNs switches from reasonin…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 2 Building & implementation · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: LLMs are not databases. They do not contain their training data.
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: Base rate fallacy.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 83 posts · 1d ago
Singularity's Bounty e/cc david-p-reichert.bsky.social
Matches Context & explanation
“She's quoting me on her timeline to her 30k followers, out of context. We know where this is going.” evidence ↗
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: (Checks the replies since I replied) Thoughts and prayers What I like is you posted it thoughtfully and not with exaggeration or hyperbole
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: I also like you caught the distinction I missed, agents not LLMs. I need to be more careful with my language
Open the thread →