Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Prof. Dr Beth Singler ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Development 3d ago
⚡ 7 h early
AI models easily modified for extremist use

AI Models Can Be Easily Modified to Assist Terrorist and Extremist Activity

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Abliterated models can follow the frontier by about 6-12 months behind. That means in a year, we could have powerful open weight abliterated models capable of competently assisting in planning terrorist attacks, radicalization, and engaging in cyberattacks.…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 4d ago
Eryk Salvaggio: Insisting on “superintelligence” makes it look like it’s the politicized name for the tech, and as if “AI” is the neutral and objective label. That obscures the politics behind the choice to call i…
Prof. Dr Beth Singler: I had a student in his 60s who had worked in tech, but had apparently never heard of 'AI' during that time, and thought that it was at least devised as a term around 2020 🤔
Open the thread →