Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Build my stream Create my edition

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Mor Naaman ×

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 1d ago

Signaling in the Age of AI: Evidence from Cover Letters

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

Mor Naaman

“For more on this trend, see this paper by Cui et al. Here they show that AI assistance in writing cover letters helped with callbacks -- but only for the first couple of months. arxiv.org/abs/2509.25054”

Mor Naaman post ↗

Primary source arxiv.org ↗

Established Agents & robotics Signal 6d ago

AI coding agents generate more code, but not more software

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

Mor Naaman Meredith Martin

“Weirdly, same trend and similar takeaways (and methods!) in the research summarized here: AI coding agents generate more code, but not more software - Ars Technica share.google/tqH0TzAJJpeR...”

Mor Naaman post ↗

Primary source share.google ↗