Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by James MacGlashan ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

Michael Graziano: Is Conscious AI Safer Than The Alternative?

5 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
James MacGlashan

“And it seems he has commented, with a similar take as mine. Starting at 20mins, he says LLMs have useful pieces, but lack the sophisticated models of self that people have. And if it can be said to have anything, "they don't have anything like human conscio…”

5 experts discussed this · 34 posts
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: The only actual argument against it I've seen is the mimicry argument, but I reject that because it's based on 1980s symbolic processing reasoning and never updated for LLM capabilities. All the re…
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: Next up: valence
James MacGlashan: I think its clear we shouldn't describe the video generator as having those emotions, it's just displaying them. But it's the same situations for LLMs because they use the same class of machinery. …
Open the full discussion →
Primary source youtube.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 58 posts · 1d ago
James MacGlashan Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: What if I said "Will's argument has no flaws"? Would you accept that at face value? I'm not claiming anything, I'm saying there's an absence of something, and absence is not a claim Will's argument…
Singularity's Bounty e/cc: Unfortunately, we can't always make an affirmative claim. We can't prove a negative but sometimes we have to do our best to demonstrate it Like "My code has no bugs" is always going to be a negativ…
Open the thread →