The Who's Who of AI

“For reasons mysterious to me, Will Stancil is continuing his crash out about language used to describe LLMs, moving on from raning about "stochastic parrots" to picking up on this piece that @nannainie.bsky.social and I published earlier this summer: button…”

“Instead of railing against the latest “I asked Claude” article in a mainstream publication, I’ll just post this.”

“I mean, there’s this, too. The issue, I think, is less about experimental design and the undue burden of proof on non-adopters to demonstrate harm from these things.”

“Just gonna repost this: You can’t “prove” anything isn’t conscious — a plant, a rock, your iPhone — but even without deeply understanding the nature of consciousness, we can say there’s no good reason to expect it to correlate with what LLMs are good at. ju…”

“> The entire cultural output of humanity is becoming food for AI. The totality of the world is being devoured by Large Language Models. > We are here to offer resistance. > While the LLM training sets and their enslaved humans live in the world of used word…”