Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,451 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Steven Levy ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 6 h early
AI consciousness alive Wired essay

Who Cares if AI Is Conscious—It’s Basically Alive

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I hoped that at some point responsible pubs would stop doing this. Alas…”

“No, no, no. Oh, the credulity. They don't think. They don't lie. They are neither conscious nor sentient. They calculate. Just stop. Who Cares if AI Is Conscious—It’s Basically Alive www.wired.com/story/who-ca...”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Hypervisible : I hoped that at some point responsible pubs would stop doing this. Alas…
Hypervisible : “Maybe the models themselves will provide the answers, not only claiming consciousness for themselves but figuring out how to prove it empirically. In that case, consider philosophers one more job …
Hypervisible : Haha.
Open the full discussion →