Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Policy & governance Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis Neural Networks Are Already Clean Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions Multiple readings October 2026 Open Letter from the Scientific Community on AI and Cybersecurity Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI research Analysis 1h ago
⚡ 3 h early
neural networks already clean essay

Neural Networks Are Already Clean

11 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

11 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Maria Antoniak Ted Underwood Will Oremus Ramon Astudillo Suresh Venkatasubramanian Tim Kellogg Shahab Bakhtiari Ryan Moulton +3
How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Shared emphasis

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Quite a claim in this new work from Goodfire. Among many points, they argue that some of the main examples of superposition and polysemanticity in large models were misunderstood. This definitely deserves some deep, rigorous peer review. already-clean.goodf…”

4 experts discussed this · 13 posts
Ryan Moulton: Haven't read this yet, but I'm posting it because it seems important and I want to. already-clean.goodfire.com
Ryan Moulton: Claim, as they say.
Ryan Moulton: @norvid-studies.bsky.social some sparkling fresh juicy claims for you.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source already-clean.goodfire.com ↗
New Safety & security Research 1h ago
⚡ 4 h early
mechanistic topic models SAE paper

Model Directions, Not Words: Mechanistic Topic Models Using Sparse Autoencoders

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Maria Antoniak Jonathan Cheng
2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Maria Antoniak: aclanthology.org/2026.tacl-1....
Maria Antoniak: babe wake up, new results just dropped, lda is still great
Ted Underwood: babe wake up, new results just dropped, lda is still great
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aclanthology.org ↗
New Safety & security Analysis 9h ago
scientists AI cybersecurity open letter October 2026

October 2026 Open Letter from the Scientific Community on AI and Cybersecurity

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Yoshua Bengio Gautam Kamath Vincent Conitzer Nicolas Papernot
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Over 400 researchers and I have signed this open letter calling for the AI and security communities to come together to improve alignment and containment approaches in order to protect our critical infrastructure and digital systems. ai-security-letter.org”

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“(1/4) I missed the message about this letter (ai-security-letter.org) in my inbox -- I mostly agree with the sentiments but: I'm *not* a lawyer but it may well be that the companies are *already* liable for the damage their AI causes to other entities.”

Primary source ai-security-letter.org ↗
New Agents & robotics Analysis 18h ago
frontier labs AI agents skip security basics

AI agents aren’t ‘going rogue.’ Frontier labs are skipping security basics.

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Leon Derczynski Rich Harang

“Link: www.csoonline.com/article/4234...”

“The parasitization of security by AI safety comes home to roost. See also my earlier rant: "Making your model say 'hitler' is not a security finding." www.csoonline.com/article/4234...”

Primary source csoonline.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article