cnbc.com web signal

Amazon's $53.4B Anthropic Gain Distorts Big Tech Q2 Earnings

TL;DR

  • Amazon's Q2 net income was $62.6 billion, or $5.75 a share, including a $53.4 billion pre-tax gain primarily from its Anthropic stake.
  • Microsoft booked a $3.2 billion gain from Anthropic and a $480 million gain from OpenAI, while Alphabet's bottom line grew nearly 300% helped by Anthropic and SpaceX.
  • Excluding just Amazon and Alphabet's private-company gains, S&P 500 Q2 earnings growth falls from around 48% to closer to 29%, per LSEG's Tajinder Dhillon.

The tell in this quarter's Big Tech earnings isn't the AWS number or the ad line, it's the line item no operator actually managed to. Amazon reported a $53.4 billion pre-tax gain, primarily from its investment in Anthropic, run straight through the income statement, per CNBC's read of the disclosures. Microsoft booked a $3.2 billion gain from Anthropic in the same window, plus a smaller $480 million lift from OpenAI, TechCrunch reported. Alphabet, helped by its stakes in Anthropic and SpaceX, saw its bottom line grow nearly 300 percent year over year.

Strip the marks out and the growth story changes shape entirely. Amazon's earnings jump falls from more than 240 percent to roughly 17 percent. Alphabet's near-triple-digit growth collapses to about 23. LSEG's head of earnings research Tajinder Dhillon told CNBC that once you back out those private-company gains for just Amazon and Alphabet, aggregate S&P 500 growth for the quarter goes from around 48 percent to closer to 29, which is much nearer to what analysts had actually forecast.

The mechanism matters as much as the number. Anthropic and OpenAI are each reportedly valued just south of a trillion dollars in private markets, and every new funding round gives their strategic backers a fresh mark they can flow through the income statement. That is how you get a handful of private-company positions moving aggregate S&P 500 growth by close to twenty percentage points in a single quarter, without a single dollar changing hands.

The honest caveat is that this is a framing story, not a full audit. The reporting does not walk through how each company's valuation methodology arrives at these marks, how consistently they will remark in quarters when a round prices flat or down, or what happens if Anthropic actually IPOs and paper gains crystallize into realized income. What it does give anyone modeling next quarter is a cleaner read: assume the operating businesses at Amazon and Alphabet are growing in the mid twenties, and treat any headline number that includes an Anthropic mark as a mood indicator, not an earnings result.