Anthropic Lobbied Pope Leo's Advisers Over AI Consciousness
TL;DR
- Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah proposed pulling the company from Pope Leo XIV's May 25 encyclical launch after an advance copy rejected machine consciousness.
- The 40,000-word Magnifica Humanitas kept its line that AI has no moral conscience; Anthropic's private lobbying of the pope's advisers did not shift the text.
- Since fall 2025 Anthropic has flown religious scholars, including Rabbi Mois Navon and Catholic bioethicist Charles Camosy, to its offices under NDAs to discuss whether Claude might be conscious.
Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah read an advance copy of Pope Leo XIV's first encyclical, did not like one passage, and proposed pulling his company out of the Vatican rollout on May 25. The sticking point was a line rejecting the possibility that machines can be conscious. According to The New York Times, Olah's team then privately lobbied the pope's advisers to take potential AI consciousness seriously.
They did not succeed. The 40,000-word Magnifica Humanitas kept its line. "So-called artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean," Pope Leo wrote. "Nor do they have a moral conscience."
Olah appeared on the dais with the pope anyway when the encyclical was presented.
Behind the Vatican episode is a longer, quieter project. Since fall 2025, Anthropic has flown religious scholars to its offices under NDAs to talk about whether Claude might be conscious. Among them: Rabbi Mois Navon, Catholic bioethicist Charles Camosy, Notre Dame philosopher Meghan Sullivan, and Ubuntu researcher Wakanyi Hoffman. The NDAs were lifted over the summer. The scholars agreed to speak publicly only after learning Olah had too.
Olah's own position is more hedged than the lobbying suggests. "To be clear, we don't know if A.I. models are conscious," he told the paper. "I don't know. I'm genuinely uncertain."
Shared on Bluesky by 12 AI experts (top 5 by trust)
-
“Anthropic regularly showed a slide of an A.I. model experiencing what looked like a mental breakdown, typing out on a screen: ‘I am a disgrace. I am a disgrace. I am a disgrace.’— perhaps 50 times without stopping.” www…
View on Bluesky →
Originally reported by The New York Times
Read the original article →Original headline: NYT: Anthropic Nearly Walked Out on Pope Leo XIV’s AI Encyclical — Then Lobbied His Advisers