Φ-Bench: Claude Opus 5 Tops 36.53% on LLM Infrastructure Tasks
TL;DR
- Claude Opus 5 led Φ-Bench at 36.53%, ahead of Kimi K3 at 28.12% and GPT 5.6 Sol at 24.51%, across 85 infrastructure engineering tasks.
- The best model reached 62.94% on end-to-end optimization but only 5.4% on hardware and edge, one of nine categories the benchmark covers.
- Φ-Bench packages 85 tasks derived from 2,260 papers and 1,852 artifacts, split into kernel completion, long-horizon implementation, and end-to-end optimization.
The best frontier model on Φ-Bench, a new benchmark that asks whether large language models can build the infrastructure that runs them, scored 36.53%. That model, Claude Opus 5, led an eight-model field that included Kimi K3 at 28.12%, GPT 5.6 Sol at 24.51%, and DeepSeek V4Pro at 13.31%.
The paper on arXiv, from a team led by Leilei Ding, packages 85 tasks derived from 2,260 papers and 1,852 artifacts across nine top-level categories: training, inference and serving, compression, kernel, I/O, hardware and edge, data infrastructure, system optimization, and system assurance. Tasks come in three shapes: 55 kernel-function completions, 20 long-horizon implementations, and 10 end-to-end optimizations. The paper frames the workload as "open-ended, long-horizon LLM infrastructure engineering."
Category-level numbers are uneven. On end-to-end optimization, Claude Opus 5 reached 62.94%. On hardware and edge, the best model managed 5.4%. The authors read the top-line result as "substantial room for improvement."
The premise the benchmark tests comes from the paper's own opening line: LLMs "have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning and code generation, raising the prospect that they could assist in developing and optimizing the very infrastructure that powers them."
Originally reported by paper
Read the original article →Original headline: Φ-Bench: Best Frontier LLM Scores 36% on Tasks to Engineer Its Own AI Stack