Copenhagen ML model spots strokes on helpline calls at 63%
TL;DR
- A machine-learning pipeline hit 63.0% stroke sensitivity on MH-1813 helpline calls versus 52.7% for human call-takers, with p < 0.0001.
- Positive predictive value rose from 17.1% to 24.9%, with ground truth matched against the Danish Stroke Registry.
- The model performed better on men than women but showed less sex bias than call-takers; authors frame it as a supportive tool, not a replacement.
A machine-learning pipeline reviewing audio from Copenhagen's non-emergency medical helpline recognised stroke in 63.0% of cases, against 52.7% for human call-takers, in a retrospective study published in npj Digital Medicine. Positive predictive value also rose, from 17.1% to 24.9%, with the differences significant at p < 0.0001.
The system, from researchers at Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Corti and the Technical University of Denmark, chains a speech-recognition network to a text classifier trained on MH-1813 helpline calls from 2015 through 2020 and evaluated on 2021 calls, with the Danish Stroke Registry as ground truth. Stroke accounted for only 0.250% of MH-1813 calls in 2021, a rarity the authors cite as part of why individual call-takers struggle.
Performance was uneven across patient sex. "The model performed significantly better on men than on women," the authors write, adding that "women may experience different and more challenging-to-identify symptoms than men." They also report that "the model exhibited less bias than call-takers did."
The paper is careful about scope. "This study does not imply that a machine-learning model can replace medical call-takers," the authors write; rather, "the model should be used as a supportive tool for call-takers in the decision-making process."
Shared on Bluesky by 1 AI expert
Originally reported by nature.com
Read the original article →Original headline: A retrospective study on machine learning-assisted stroke recognition for medical helpline calls - npj Digital Medicine