scmp.com web signal

Bessent Says China Getting Ahead in AI Is America's Top Risk

china ai regulation us-china-ai trade-policy

TL;DR

  • Bessent ranked China surpassing the US in AI above both safety concerns and job losses as America's biggest AI risk.
  • Bessent described himself as point person on both US AI policy and the economic relationship with China.
  • Both nations agreed to begin formal bilateral AI governance discussions following Trump and Xi's May talks.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has put a sharp point on how the Trump administration ranks the risks of artificial intelligence. Speaking at the Economic Club of New York on June 24, Bessent said 'the biggest risk to AI is China getting ahead of us,' placing that competitive concern explicitly above safety hazards and job losses, the two issues that dominate most domestic AI debates.

Bessent framed his standing on this issue directly: 'I am one of the point people on our AI policy. I am the point person in terms of the economic relationship with China.' That dual role matters because it signals that AI policy and trade policy toward China are being managed as a single portfolio in this administration, not as separate tracks.

His logic for why the US is still in front was equally direct: 'The reason the Chinese are willing to have a discussion on AI is because we are ahead, so we have to stay ahead.' The remarks followed Trump and Xi's May talks in Beijing, after which both nations agreed to begin formal bilateral AI governance discussions. China's foreign ministry characterized both countries as 'leading AI powers' requiring collaborative development approaches.

The honest caveat is that Bessent's remarks describe a posture, not a policy with specific mechanisms. What 'staying ahead' means in practice was not spelled out in the reporting, and the bilateral governance discussions are described as planned rather than underway. What topics they will cover, and whether either side will share anything meaningful given the competitive framing, remains an open question.

For companies and researchers working in frontier AI, the implication is that the current administration will prioritize US competitive positioning in ways that could shape export controls, procurement, and standards work. Whether that leads to durable governance structures or stays at the level of rhetoric is the thing worth watching.