theverge.com web signal

Dave Eggers tells OpenAI ChatGPT is silencing a generation

TL;DR

  • Novelist Dave Eggers accepted an invite from Sam Altman and used a talk at OpenAI to call ChatGPT's effect on students apocalyptic.
  • He argued there is no safe amount of AI in humanities for students under 22 and that outsourcing voice to a machine leaves them voiceless.
  • Eggers claimed ChatGPT is adding 20 hours a week to public school teachers' workloads and praised in-class handwritten essays as a workaround.

The interesting bit here isn't that a well-known novelist dislikes ChatGPT. It's that Sam Altman invited him to OpenAI's headquarters and got a lecture on record. According to The Verge, Dave Eggers, the author and founder of McSweeney's, used the invited talk to tell assembled staff their product is "silencing an entire generation."

The specific lines he chose are worth reading closely. In a fuller account published by The Irish Times, Eggers said the tool is "adding 20 hours a week to the workload of every public school teacher in this country" and that the effect on young writers is "apocalyptic." His threshold is unusually specific: "there is no safe amount of AI in humanities for kids under 22, at least in writing." If a student "decides to shop out their voice to a machine," he warned, "they become voiceless." Reported quotes from inside the room add that he told staff they had made "every teacher's job untenable."

Why this matters for anyone shipping into education: OpenAI's classroom story has quietly been one of its stronger consumer narratives, from ChatGPT Edu district deals to teacher power-user testimonials. A high-profile author saying to OpenAI's face that the product is making teachers' jobs untenable reframes the debate away from cheating detection, which sounds solvable, and toward workload and developmental harm, which don't. Once policymakers pick up phrases like "20 hours" and "under 22," the conversation gets harder to steer.

The honest caveat is that this is one author's argument, not a study. The 20-hour figure isn't sourced in the reporting I could find, and Eggers has been a public tech critic since his novel The Circle. What the reporting doesn't give you is any sense of how OpenAI staff actually responded in the room, or whether the visit changes anything about the company's product plans for schools.

The forward-looking read is that the winners in ed-tech AI over the next year may be the vendors who explicitly ship for the teacher's workload, not the student's essay. Handwritten in-class assessments, which Eggers praised as producing much more effective writers, are already the de facto workaround in many classrooms; the tool that quietly supports that world may beat the one that keeps promising better detectors.

Shared on Bluesky by 2 AI experts