nature.com web signal

Paper2Agent converts research papers into interactive AI agents

TL;DR

  • Paper2Agent scaled to 74 computational biology papers, generating 593 validated tools from 599 proposed; the AlphaGenome agent cost about US$14 to build.
  • On 300 tutorial questions the framework hit 91.2% ± 1.6% accuracy versus 80.3% ± 2.3% for a Claude + Repo baseline.
  • The evaluation leaned biological: 100 computational biology papers, 26 data-focused papers, and only 10 non-biology papers.

Paper2Agent, a framework introduced in Nature, converted 74 computational biology papers into AI agents, generating 593 validated tools from 599 proposed. Each agent packages a paper's manuscript, code, datasets and workflows into what the authors call a "virtual corresponding author, exposing its manuscript, supplementary materials, datasets, code and workflows as active, agent-native knowledge rather than static text."

Jiacheng Miao, Joe R. Davis, Yaohui Zhang, Jonathan K. Pritchard and James Zou describe a pipeline that locates a paper's repository, sets up its environment, scans its tutorials, executes them, extracts working functions, and assembles them into a Model Context Protocol server. Building the AlphaGenome agent cost about US$14 and produced 22 validated tools; the Scanpy single-cell library produced 7. Processing time was roughly 45 minutes per paper.

On 300 tutorial questions the framework scored 91.2% ± 1.6% accuracy against a Claude + Repo baseline of 80.3% ± 2.3%. Novel AlphaGenome queries scored 100.0% ± 0.0% and open-ended questions 82.7% ± 2.4%. The authors report cutting "median runtime by 1.9× and 3.1× relative to Claude + Repo and Biomni, respectively."

"MCP is a standardized protocol that allows structured APIs and tools to be exposed in a way that is directly accessible to LLMs and agent frameworks," the authors write. In one case study, the AlphaGenome agent prioritised *SORT1* as a causal gene for an LDL cholesterol variant, validated against GTEx eQTL data at P = 1.1 × 10⁻⁶⁵.

The evaluation leans biological: 100 computational biology papers, 26 data-focused papers, and 10 non-biology papers. The larger claim reaches past individual reuse: "Once scientific knowledge is encoded in active agents rather than static artefacts, the potential extends beyond individual use." Five researchers we track in our Who's Who shared it.

Shared on Bluesky by 5 AI experts