Who's Who of AI

Nicole Hennig

172 trust @nic221.bsky.social · 5,125 followers
Why they matter

Tracked through public AI activity and peer connections inside the directory.

AI signals
53
past 30d
Sources
45
distinct domains
Discussions
2
past 30d
Latest signal
1d ago
View every signal from Nicole Hennig →
E-learning dev & AI educator at U of Arizona Libraries. Former head of UX at MIT Libraries. Winner of MIT Excellence Award. nicolehennig.com. Digital nomad from 2013-17, locationflexiblelife.com. - vegetarian - car-free - universal basic income: yes
What they're sharing

Articles & links

Introducing Claude Opus 5 www.anthropic.com/news/claude-op… #AI #Anthropic

Introducing Claude Opus 5 anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Anthropic launched Claude Opus 5 on July 24, 2026 at $5 per million input tokens, matching Opus 4.8's rate.
  • On Frontier-Bench v0.1 Opus 5 scored 43.3%, versus 18.7% for Opus 4.8 and 33.7% for Fable 5.
  • Opus 5 becomes the default on Claude Max but sits behind Mythos 5 on cybersecurity tasks, per Anthropic.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 1 ↩ 0 · 9 from the directory shared this · 44d ago

Introducing Claude Sonnet 5 www.anthropic.com/news/claude-so… #AI #Anthropic #Claude

Introducing Claude Sonnet 5 \ Anthropic anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5 on June 30, 2026, calling it 'the most agentic Sonnet model yet' and pitching it for autonomous browser and terminal use.
  • Through August 31, 2026 Sonnet 5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output, then steps to standard rates of $3 and $15.
  • A new tokenizer means the same input can map to roughly 1.0 to 1.35 times more tokens than prior Anthropic models, partly offsetting the headline discount.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 1 ↩ 0 · 8 from the directory shared this · 68d ago

AI agents are checking the scientific literature — and spotting decades-old errors www.nature.com/articles/d4158… #AI #FactChecking

AI agents are checking the scientific literature — and spotting decades-old errors nature.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A Zhejiang Lab chemist's AI predicting boiling points clashed with a 75-year-old reference database; manual checks showed the database, not the model, was wrong.
  • The same AI spotted further mistakes in older papers and reference books, including a typo and incorrect values of century-old boiling-point measurements.
  • Researchers caution AI fact-checkers are not reliable on their own because the models make mistakes like humans do and still need manual oversight.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 3 ↩ 0 · 6 from the directory shared this · 31d ago
Their network

In Nicole Hennig's orbit

Center = Nicole Hennig. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you Nicole Hennig? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/nic221-bsky-social)