theatlantic.com web signal

Shopify Ranks Itself #1 in 60 Lists; AI Chatbots Cite It

TL;DR

  • Will Oremus, writing in The Atlantic, calls the new tactic 'sloptimization': vendors publishing self-ranked listicles aimed at AI chatbots rather than humans.
  • By his count Shopify has posted 60+ self-ranking listicles, Figma at least six, and ClickUp nearly 300; the runner-up changes, the winner does not.
  • When Oremus asked ChatGPT for the best way to set up an online storefront, it named Shopify first and cited Shopify's own ranking pages.

Years ago recipe bloggers noticed Google liked long articles, and a million padded preambles were born. The 2026 equivalent, reported by Will Oremus in The Atlantic this month, is uglier. He calls it 'sloptimization,' and the mechanic is simple: a vendor publishes a ranked listicle with itself at the top, the chatbot scrapes it, and the chatbot parrots the recommendation.

Shopify is the cleanest example in the piece. By Oremus's count Shopify has posted more than sixty ranked listicles with titles like '10 Best Ecommerce Platforms for Small Business in 2026,' where the runner-up changes and the winner never does. Figma has run at least six. ClickUp has published nearly 300. When Oremus asked ChatGPT for the best way to set up an online storefront, the bot named Shopify first, and the citations underneath it pointed back at Shopify's own ranking pages.

The reason this matters now, rather than as a long-running SEO grumble, is timing. Google has announced what it billed as the biggest change to search in 25 years, with the search box expanding as you type and sometimes morphing into a chatbot, and the SEO industry has already reorganized around what it now calls GEO, for generative-engine optimization. Ahrefs, an SEO platform, ran an analysis late last year and reported that these self-promotional lists really do lift brand mentions in AI answers. Treat that as a directional claim, not a settled measurement, but it lines up with what Oremus observed with ChatGPT and Shopify.

The honest caveat is that the article is anecdote plus one third-party analysis. The reporting does not tell you how widely the trick works across Gemini, Claude, or Perplexity, how often any of those bots flag the conflict of interest, or how quickly the model vendors plan to add citation-source filters now that the practice has a name in print.

The forward-looking part is who gains if the AI builders do react. Independent reviewers and editorial publishers, the kind of sources chatbots already cite grudgingly, get a much clearer pitch as the trustworthy thing to ground an answer in. Until then, the bots will keep believing the listicles.

Shared on Bluesky by 2 AI experts