Singapore Bets AI Access Keeps Fund Managers From Hong Kong
TL;DR
- Singapore is pitching neutral access to both US and Chinese frontier models, including Moonshot and DeepSeek, as a reason for fund managers to stay.
- Hong Kong is countering with tax incentives for fund managers and family offices, changing the treatment of carried interest and performance fees.
- AIMA warned in July that Singapore tax rollbacks were already prompting hedge fund and PE executives to relocate to Hong Kong.
Singapore's pitch to its finance industry has quietly shifted from tax and infrastructure to compute and model access. Reporting in the Financial Times, summarised at Cryptopolitan, lays out the argument the city-state is now making to hedge fund and private equity managers weighing a move to Hong Kong: because Singapore keeps working relationships with both Washington and Beijing, its firms can plug into the latest US frontier models and Chinese ones like Moonshot and DeepSeek without the export scrutiny that increasingly bites Hong Kong counterparts.
The people quoted are the ones who would know. Kher Sheng Lee, co-head of Asia-Pacific at AIMA, framed it as being about business certainty and told the FT that for AI you need access to the latest tools. Justin Tan of LEK Consulting called Singapore a bit of a sweet spot on technology access. Kerry Goh, CEO of Kamet Capital, said clients can be told their intellectual property stays independent of external restrictions when the work is done from Singapore. Backing the argument with something concrete from the market, Citadel relocated Hong Kong-based quantitative research staff to Singapore and Miami, citing data-security concerns.
None of this is happening in a vacuum. Hong Kong is trying to draw the same people the other way, with proposed tax incentives for fund managers and family offices, changes to how carried interest and performance fees are treated, and exploratory extensions to bring proprietary trading firms like Jane Street inside the benefit. The stakes are real in cash terms: some Asian fund managers cleared performance bonuses of more than $1 million last year, with top earners taking home more than $50 million, which is precisely the compensation profile a tax-relief regime is designed to lock in.
Not all of the trend runs Singapore's way. AIMA raised concerns in July that tax rollbacks were already prompting Singapore executives to move to Hong Kong, so the AI-access argument is being deployed to reverse a flow that has begun. Neither the FT nor its follow-on summaries quantify how many managers have actually shifted, and they do not name which specific frontier models Singapore banks are running in production. Chinese-model access in particular sits on ground that has moved repeatedly across our tracker of China AI news, including this week's report that Apple trained its own China LLM with Alibaba after Beijing clearance, so a policy shock in either capital could rewrite the pitch quickly.
The forward read is that a two-hub competition has quietly become a three-variable one: tax, talent, and now tooling. Firms that can honestly tell portfolio managers they may use whichever model does the job get to compete for people whose economics used to be decided almost entirely by tax residency.
Originally reported by ft.com
Read the original article →Original headline: FT: Singapore Banks on Advanced-AI Access to Stop Finance High-Flyers Defecting to Hong Kong