My take, given the data: PNAS doesn't publish serious pure math anymore because math profs don't want to send their best work to PNAS. They prefer to send it elsewhere. But why did the emergent consensus change? No idea... Preprint here if interested: arxiv.org/abs/2603.00807
Who's Who of AI
Dan Larremore
Prof | CU Boulder BioFrontiers Institute + Computer Science | Santa Fe Institute | LarremoreLab.github.io
Founder | CevianLabs.io
What they're sharing
Consensus and fragmentation in academic publication preferences arxiv.org
Collective Motion of Moshers at Heavy Metal Concerts arxiv.org
Articles & links
arxiv.org/abs/1302.1886
Their own posts
Recent commentary
Slides at an academic conference in the age of AI… Claude has an incredibly obvious style, which is better than average but undifferentiated! needs bigger fonts. 🫣
Their network
In Dan Larremore's orbit
Center = Dan Larremore. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.