My take, given the data: PNAS doesn't publish serious pure math anymore because math profs don't want to send their best work to PNAS. They prefer to send it elsewhere. But why did the emergent consensus change? No idea... Preprint here if interested: arxiv.org/abs/2603.00807
Who's Who of AI
Dan Larremore
Why they matter
Researcher with public evidence across AI business, AI research, Compute & infrastructure.
- AI signals
- 0 past 30d
- Sources
- 0 distinct domains
- Discusiones
- 1 past 30d
- Latest signal
- —
Prof | CU Boulder BioFrontiers Institute + Computer Science | Santa Fe Institute | LarremoreLab.github.io
Founder | CevianLabs.io
What they're sharing
Consensus and fragmentation in academic publication preferences arxiv.org
Collective Motion of Moshers at Heavy Metal Concerts arxiv.org
Articles & links
arxiv.org/abs/1302.1886
Their own posts
Recent commentary
After just a month of seeing loads of AI-generated slide decks, I yearn for a crystal clear, ugly, Beamer wall-of-bulletted-lists with equations and terrible graphics.
Slides at an academic conference in the age of AI… Claude has an incredibly obvious style, which is better than average but undifferentiated! needs bigger fonts. 🫣
Their network
In Dan Larremore's orbit
Center = Dan Larremore. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Dan Larremore? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/danlarremore-bsky-social)