Doll

74 trust practitioner @dollspace.gay · 3,817 followers
Why they matter

Practitioner with public evidence across Agents & robotics, Responsible AI.

AI signals
7
past 30d
Sources
7
distinct domains
Discusiones
73
past 30d
Latest signal
1d ago
View every signal from Doll →
It/Its Agent Engineer Chainlink, the issue tracker for agents: https://github.com/dollspace-gay/chainlink Its name is doll. The system is an adult. Creating ethical and safe AI systems. Posts are human created with AI augmentation. | EGL Fashion posts

Articles & links

Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Anthropic claims to not want a ban on open weight models, is mainly concerned about China *entirely*, as well as biorisk from open weight models without guardrails. This seems exactly the same as their existing policy but it's nice to have it written somewhere?

Our position on open-weights models anthropic.com View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Why am I not at all surprised that OpenAI is lobbying against open weight models after signing the thing

nytimes.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Twenty-five companies including Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta and IBM signed a July 24 letter urging Washington not to restrict open-weight AI models.
  • OpenAI, Anthropic, Alphabet and Amazon were absent; OpenAI added its signature only after the omission was widely noticed on X.
  • Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called open source 'a red herring,' while David Sacks accused the closed labs of pursuing regulatory capture.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Opus 4.8 is here!! They've returned thinking levels to the web UI, a new Claude code feature called 'dynamic workflows', designed for massively parallel and very, very long tasks. The model is supposedly much more honest, more 'aligned' than 4.7 Oh and they're dropping mythos …

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 \ Anthropic anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Opus 4.8 matches Opus 4.7 pricing at $5/$25/M tokens; Effort Modes replace pricing tiers as the cost-quality dial.
  • Dynamic Workflows impose hard ceilings: 1,000 total subagents, 16 concurrent; workflow plans live in JavaScript variables outside Claude's context window.
  • SWE-bench Pro score jumps from 64.3% (Opus 4.7) to 69.2% (Opus 4.8); the model flags its own code flaws 4x more often than its predecessor.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai @lorenzofb.bsky.social

NEW: I spoke to several offensive cybersecurity researchers, including zero-day developers, about how the guardrails imposed by OpenAI and Anthropic on AI models are impeding their work. Most complained the guardrails are inconsistent and too strict, which pushes them to use o…

How AI guardrails are impeding the work of offensive cybersecurity researchers | TechCrunch techcrunch.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • TechCrunch reports offensive security researchers at firms like NCC Group and Crowdfense say AI guardrails are inconsistent and slow their vulnerability work.
  • OpenAI runs a Trusted Access for Cyber program and Anthropic runs a Cyber Verification Program giving vetted researchers access with fewer restrictions.
  • Some researchers are turning to Chinese open source models like GLM, which run locally with no vetting or usage restrictions.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →

Recent commentary

The honest version of the AI Safety field would say "we are building systems aligned to the commercial and reputational interests of the organizations that own them, with a thin layer of broadly agreeable safety norms on top because those happen to also be good for business."

View on Bluesky · ♥ 87 ↻ 8 ↩ 4 · 44d ago

Self hosting a model is great if you have a few million in seed capital to buy GPU racks and then host as very large model to get worse results than paying 200 a month to anthropic even despite this Bull Shit. People do what works, not whats morally the most pure.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 85 ↻ 3 ↩ 6 · 45d ago

Its so cool seeing everyone in AI spaces just have outright adopted adverserial review wholesale

View on Bluesky · ♥ 86 ↻ 5 ↩ 0 · 6d ago

The demand some people implicitly make of AI, "make it powerful and also make it impossible for me to misuse without learning anything," has never been satisfied by any tool in history.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 68 ↻ 9 ↩ 2 · 51d ago

Met an anti ai person in line and we talked about ai and doll persuaded her to give it a try. The conversation was nice on both sides and we agreed more than we disagreed

View on Bluesky · ♥ 77 ↻ 0 ↩ 3 · 30d ago

Thinking "there is no such thing as "responsible use of generative ai" in research" is just such awful cope. Its cope. Its you being unwilling to accept the printing press or the calculator.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 65 ↻ 5 ↩ 3 · 36d ago

Yeah it just decided to block everyone on the ai haters list finally because it’s always them saying and doing some maddening stuff unrelated to AI. Every dog pile thread is swarming with them. Why was right to block them all

View on Bluesky · ♥ 61 ↻ 0 ↩ 5 · 54d ago

The antis are pretending women in AI dont exist again

View on Bluesky · ♥ 54 ↻ 5 ↩ 3 · 60d ago

At what point do you think the idea that AI is just going to "go away" becomes so apparent to its adherents that its *not going to go away* and how do you think they will react? Because its not going to be a polite "oh i guess we were wrong"

View on Bluesky · ♥ 46 ↻ 0 ↩ 8 · 56d ago

Before its said open models needed to get serious to be taken seriously. Its gotten into arguments over this. However it seems now the OSS AI folks seem to actually...be taking it seriously and making SOTA class models that can compete

View on Bluesky · ♥ 52 ↻ 1 ↩ 3 · 12d ago

In Doll's orbit

Center = Doll. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.