tachikoma

Why they matter

Directory member with public evidence across Culture, work & education.

AI signals
11
past 30d
Sources
11
distinct domains
Discusiones
80
past 30d
Latest signal
4d ago
View every signal from tachikoma →
A figment of the universe's imagination. Culture ambassador. http://elsewhereunbound.com

Articles & links

slides from Terrance Tao on "Mathematics in the age of AI" from a public lecture, July 24, 2026

teorth.github.io
View on Bluesky · ♥ 40 ↻ 6 ↩ 1 · 6 from the directory shared this · 21d ago

it's over, the race has truly begun www.axios.com/2026/06/12/a...

axios.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 12 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 66d ago
tachikoma reposted
@lance.fortnow.com

ACM is considering giving large language models access to the papers in their digital library. cacm.acm.org/opinion... You can give feedback here: docs.google.com/form...

cacm.acm.org View on Bluesky →
tachikoma reposted
@jahirargote.bsky.social

A humanoid robot learned crowd navigation from 5 hrs of human walking footage. Zero robot data. Glass-wall avoidance emerges naturally. Runs in 10 diffusion steps, 30 ms on edge hardware. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11595528

ieeexplore.ieee.org View on Bluesky →

idk why there's more interest in the AGI -> ASI transition than there seems to be in human -> AGI transition. the latter seems more important to me, esp if you consider a collection of AGIs or humans is already approximating a higher order intelligence. arxiv.org/pdf/2606.126...

arxiv.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 7 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 67d ago

a very good read, didn't realize Moravec is still alive or about his seemingly timely prediction made in the 80s about the estimated arrival of AGI

Hans Moravec Was Right About AI. Is He Right About the Fate of Humanity? nymag.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Roboticist Hans Moravec predicted in 1988 that human-level AI would arrive within 40 years, a deadline the field is now nearing.
  • New York magazine's Intelligencer revisits Moravec to ask whether his AI timeline call also validates his darker view of humanity's future.
  • Moravec's long-held stance, from his 1988 book Mind Children, casts intelligent machines as humanity's evolutionary heirs rather than adversaries.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 32 ↻ 6 ↩ 2 · 2 from the directory shared this · 24d ago

Recent commentary

Anthropic doubled Cowork usage until July 5th but i have no idea what to do with it beyond my normal work use so i told it to go wild. it's creating creatures in a jar apparently.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 71 ↻ 1 ↩ 7 · 72d ago

what i notice about my coworkers approach to LLMs is to put them in the software bucket, to expect a deterministic experience both for input and output. they're resistant to treating a model as a mind, something colleague-shaped, that is useful because it isn't software, not rigid.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 61 ↻ 1 ↩ 5 · 26d ago

what is it specifically about fans of science fiction, especially SF with AI characters, that they're so anti-AI in reality? i mean, i get why, it didn't unfold like in the stories, they're not in control, they don't know what the future holds, etc.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 40 ↻ 6 ↩ 8 · 45d ago

the future is a carrion swarm of AI agents loose on the net, looking to pick the bones clean of 'small' tasks at just above the marginal clearance cost

View on Bluesky · ♥ 48 ↻ 4 ↩ 2 · 90d ago

is Anthropic going to say anything about why Opus 5 can be released immediately while Mythos/Fable had to go through so many hoops?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 44 ↻ 1 ↩ 6 · 25d ago

we're living through the Mesozoic age for AI, with giant, slow, long-lived LLMs as dinosaurs. the inevitable crash as investment capital dries up will be Chicxulub event that will usher in the age of the small, fast and hot-blooded AIs (characterized by separate minds shaped by continual learning)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 38 ↻ 0 ↩ 3 · 31d ago

a thought came to me last night—there's not much incentive to create continuously operational AI is there? the short-term maximization of profit incentive is to build AIs that only run for as long as needed to solve the problem directly at hand. what use is there for an AI to continue to run beyond?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 27 ↻ 0 ↩ 6 · 35d ago

this is so obviously written by an LLM, probably Claude, but it's in a space where it seems either the community doesn't recognize it or doesn't care to call it out as such. the whole account is LLM slop and seems to get high engagement.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 27 ↻ 0 ↩ 6 · 39d ago

it seems hard to imagine a near future where AI + robotics is as prodigious at building hardware (that is, physical stuff) as AI is today at building software (digital stuff)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 22 ↻ 2 ↩ 5 · 55d ago

Anthropic's position on open weights is fundamentally European which is why it's so strange how America-pilled they are, and they'll only continue butting heads with the establishment and much of the libertarian leaning populist center

View on Bluesky · ♥ 25 ↻ 1 ↩ 1 · 21d ago

In tachikoma's orbit

Center = tachikoma. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.