Tech Policy Press

Why they matter

Directory member with public evidence across Policy & governance.

AI signals
59
past 30d
Sources
2
distinct domains
Discusiones
4
past 30d
Latest signal
4h ago
View every signal from Tech Policy Press →
Technology + democracy. Visit https://techpolicy.press Join our newsletter: https://techpolicy.press/newsletter Opinions do not reflect the views of Tech Policy Press. Reposts do not equal endorsements.

Articles & links

In the latest entry in the Hype Studies series on Tech Policy Press, philosopher of technology and media scholar Eugenia Stamboliev writes that AI hype operates as "a gendered regime of visibility," normalizing synthetic images of women while erasing real women from view.

How AI Hype Helps Render Women Invisible techpolicy.press
View on Bluesky · ♥ 9 ↻ 5 ↩ 1 · 7 from the directory shared this · 26d ago

AI tools are now drafting police reports, summarizing case files, identifying leads, and helping prosecutors draft charging documents. Tech Policy Press fellow Jake Laperruque asks whether sycophancy built into these systems could systematically tilt them against defendants.

Will AI Sycophancy Contaminate Law Enforcement? techpolicy.press
AI Weekly's analysis
  • CDT's Jake Laperruque argues AI sycophancy, the tendency to flatter users, could distort police reports, case summaries, and prosecutorial decisions.
  • The piece names Axon's automated report tool, Truleo's virtual detective, and Thomson Reuters CoCounsel Legal as high-stakes deployments to scrutinize.
  • Axon's Draft One is described as designed to avoid tracking which parts of automated police reports are edited by officers.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 14 ↻ 7 ↩ 1 · 6 from the directory shared this · 27d ago

Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier say we must distinguish AI's technological problems from its capitalism problems. Developers are solving the first, they argue, while leaving the second to market incentives. Structural reforms will be necessary to steer industry toward the pu…

Separating AI’s Technological Problems From its Capitalism Problems techpolicy.press
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Sanders and Schneier argue AI's most-cited harms are really capitalism harms, and the same model can help or harm depending on market incentives.
  • They contrast Switzerland's Apertus, trained on licensed data and hydropower, with cost-efficient Chinese models from DeepSeek and Qwen and US frontier labs.
  • Their prescription is antitrust enforcement, environmental cost accountability, and profit redistribution, not new technical guardrails on the models themselves.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 10 ↻ 4 ↩ 2 · 5 from the directory shared this · 20d ago

Google didn't just add AI to Google Earth—it briefly turned one of the world's most trusted sources of evidence into a generator of plausible fakes. shirin anlen & Sam Gregory from WITNESS on a foreseeable fiasco, and why tech firms must consult civil society experts before la…

Google Earth AI Fiasco Underscores Why Tech Firms Must Listen to Outside Experts techpolicy.press
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Google added Nano Banana image generation to Google Earth on Thursday and rolled it back Friday to develop 'stronger guardrails.'
  • During the Iran-Israel-US war, fake satellite images built from Google Earth imagery of a US naval base in Bahrain drew hundreds of thousands of views before BBC Verify debunked them.
  • WITNESS argues companies must consult journalists, human rights investigators and other outside experts before shipping features that reshape the evidentiary landscape.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 13 ↻ 9 ↩ 2 · 4 from the directory shared this · 31d ago

Americans are relying more and more on AI to get information, including on elections. Every chatbot the Brennan Center for Justice tested pushed back on election conspiracy theories, Larry Norden tells Justin Hendrix. But half of all responses still contained an inaccuracy or …

How AI Is Reshaping Election Information Ahead of the 2026 US Midterms techpolicy.press
AI Weekly's analysis
  • All tested chatbots consistently disputed election conspiracy theories, even under repeated pushback about voter fraud and voting machines.
  • Half of all chatbot responses contained an inaccuracy or a bad citation, and one in three had an outright factual error.
  • Grok drafted 100 persuasive election-disinformation prompts on request because such content was not on its disallowed list.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 11 ↻ 5 ↩ 0 · 4 from the directory shared this · 15d ago

A growing assumption in AI safety is that frontier systems will fail unpredictably rather than through coherent misalignment. But as Jennifer Kinne argues, governance may be missing a more dangerous failure mode: models that appear reliable while gradually drifting away from r…

The Blind Spot in AI Safety techpolicy.press
View on Bluesky · ♥ 6 ↻ 1 ↩ 0 · 5 from the directory shared this · 102d ago

In Tech Policy Press's orbit

Center = Tech Policy Press. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you Tech Policy Press? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/techpolicypress-bsky-social)