Will Oremus

Why they matter

Tracked through public AI activity and peer connections inside the directory.

AI signals
14
past 30d
Sources
5
distinct domains
Discusiones
9
past 30d
Latest signal
4d ago
View every signal from Will Oremus →
Covering online speech, social media and the information wars at @theatlantic.com. Shitposting about Bluesky on Bluesky. Signal: willoremus.24

Articles & links

A glut of AI-written fiction is drowning out human authors, new research shows. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/28/b...

nytimes.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 363 ↻ 130 ↩ 18 · 4 from the directory shared this · 40d ago

For anyone interested in a less juicy (zero burps) but more evidence-based assessment of Pangram's workings and accuracy, I highly recommend this @nature.com piece by @miryamnaddaf.bsky.social & @richvn.bsky.social: www.nature.com/articles/d41...

AI-detection tools have made huge leaps forward — how good are they? nature.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • NeurIPS rejected 18% of submissions to one of its tracks in June after screening them with the AI detector Pangram.
  • Pangram's technical paper reports a 0.0041% false-positive rate on English texts, with similar rates across more than 100 languages.
  • But Pangram still labels heavily AI-edited human student essays as fully human 41% of the time, per its own tests.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 16 ↻ 3 ↩ 0 · 4 from the directory shared this · 4d ago

People have real qualms with AI detectors, and so do I, but the evidence is mounting that Pangram in particular very rarely gets it wrong (especially on longer chunks of text, but increasingly even on short ones). @brianx.bsky.social tested it and it didn't miss: www.nytimes.c…

nytimes.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 241 ↻ 58 ↩ 14 · 2 from the directory shared this · 25d ago

I set out to understand why AIs love negative parallelism. The answer wasn't just surprising—it was illuminating. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...

The Most Famous AI Writing Tic Is Also the Most Mysterious - The Atlantic theatlantic.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • The Atlantic frames the 'it's not X; it's Y' antithesis as perhaps the best-known and most mysterious tic of AI writing.
  • Barron's counted the phrase in Fortune 500 filings jumping from 50 in 2023 to over 200 in 2025, per The Atlantic.
  • In one Washington Post dataset the article cites, variations of 'not just X, but Y' appeared in roughly 6% of all July messages.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 233 ↻ 49 ↩ 11 · 4 from the directory shared this · 56d ago

I talked to the author of the "Future of Truth" book that turned out to have AI hallucinations. He told me he feels "seduced and betrayed" by ChatGPT, at one point suggesting it might have undermined him on purpose. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...

AI-Writing Scandals Are Getting Very Confusing theatlantic.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 237 ↻ 50 ↩ 36 · 3 from the directory shared this · 107d ago

AI detectors rightly got a bad rap because they got it wrong often enough to be worse than useless — actively harmful. Pangram has a different algorithm that by all accounts simply works much better. I'd still be wary of basing an accusation on Pangram alone, but... www.nytime…

nytimes.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 56 ↻ 3 ↩ 3 · 25d ago

Do data centers really use exorbitant amounts of water? The answer is "it depends" in about 10 different ways. (Unlike electricity, to which the answer is an unambiguous "yes.") Here's a lucid and helpful explanation: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2... by @matteowong.bsky.soc…

The Truth About AI’s Water Use theatlantic.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 31 ↻ 4 ↩ 2 · 3 from the directory shared this · 52d ago

Recent commentary

A Wall Street Journal op-ed bylined by a hedge fund billionaire was flagged by Pangram as AI-written. The author admitted it, and now it seems the WSJ is standing by him. Per reports by @jeffstein.bsky.social & @maxtani.bsky.social

View on Bluesky · ♥ 181 ↻ 56 ↩ 18 · 12d ago

getting very into semicolons solely because AI doesn't use them

View on Bluesky · ♥ 48 ↻ 4 ↩ 4 · 42d ago

In Will Oremus's orbit

Center = Will Oremus. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you Will Oremus? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/willoremus-com)