Maybe you mean this from 2023? www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/o... "[LLMs] are not reasoning machines. [...] It’s not just that they don’t test their outputs to make sure they’re correct or logical, or that they fail to do so in certain instances. They can’t, and they’ll never be …
B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)
Critic with public evidence across Culture, work & education.
- AI signals
- 24 past 30d
- Sources
- 22 distinct domains
- Discussions
- 58 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 2d ago
Articles & links
Cool resource from @emilymbender.bsky.social and @nannainie.bsky.social for folks looking to use more precise and less anthropomorphic language. This piece includes a bunch of examples for substitutions to support clearer communication! buttondown.com/maiht3k/arch...
- The guide covers six language categories: cognition, emotion, communication, agency, human-role analogies, and biological metaphors.
- Proposed substitutions include 'probabilistic automation' for 'artificial intelligence' and 'conversation simulator' for 'chatbot.'
- Rephrasing 'ChatGPT assisted students' as 'the students used ChatGPT' is given as an example of restoring human accountability.
Recent commentary
AI fairness folks, help me out? I know that back circa... 2018 or so, there were some handy interactives that had demonstrations of how different definitions of fairness could lead to different model behavior. I'm struggling to track down the links now. Can you point me?
In B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them)'s orbit
Center = B! 🐝 Cavello (they/them). Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.