Debora Nozza

Why they matter

Researcher with public evidence across AI research, NLP & language, Responsible AI.

AI signals
13
past 30d
Sources
3
distinct domains
Discussions
0
past 30d
Latest signal
9h ago
View every signal from Debora Nozza →
Assistant Professor at Bocconi University in MilaNLP group • Working in #NLP, #CSS and #Ethics • She/her • #ERCStG PERSONAE

Articles & links

↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

For today's reading group, @marlutz.bsky.social presented "State media control influences large language models" by Waight et al. (2026) Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41... #NLProc

State media control influences large language models | Nature nature.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Chinese state-media content appears in typical LLM training sets at roughly 41 times the rate of Chinese-language Wikipedia.
  • Across 37 countries, models prompted in the local language produce more regime-favorable responses in countries with lower press freedom.
  • A pretraining experiment with just 6,400 state-scripted documents pushed an open-weight model to pro-government responses nearly 80 percent of the time.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

For today's reading group, @veraneplenbroek.bsky.social presented "Old Habits Die Hard: How Conversational History Geometrically Traps LLMs" by Simhi et al. (2026) Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2603.03308 #NLProc

[2603.03308] Old Habits Die Hard: How Conversational History Geometrically Traps LLMs arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A new arXiv paper introduces History-Echoes, a framework showing conversation history biases what large language models generate next.
  • Across three model families and six datasets, the authors find gaps in latent space form a 'geometric trap' confining a model's response trajectory.
  • The work suggests hallucinations from earlier turns can influence later responses, implying an early mistake tends to persist inside a session.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#MemoryModay #NLProc 'SocioProbe: What, When, and Where Language Models Learn about Sociodemographics' - Lauscher et al. delve into language models' grasp of sociodemographics. Their findings? Models learn, but don't apply it. aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-m...

SocioProbe: What, When, and Where Language Models Learn about Sociodemographics aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • SocioProbe probes single-GPU PLMs on multiple English data sets using classifier probing and information-theoretic minimum description length probing.
  • The authors find that PLMs do encode gender and age, and that this knowledge is sometimes spread across the layers of tested models.
  • Models that excel in general language understanding do not seem to own more sociodemographic knowledge, which requires large amounts of pre-training data.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

We're back with the reading group! Today Lorena Calvo-Bartolomé presented "The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs" Paper: aclanthology.org/2025.acl-lon... #NLProc #LLMasajudge

aclanthology.org View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#MemoryModay #NLProc Outstanding Paper at ACL 2024! @paul-rottger.bsky.social et al. evaluate LLM values and opinions in 'Political Compass or Spinning Arrow?' aclanthology.org/2024.acl-lon...

Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Models aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • An ACL 2024 Outstanding Paper argues that LLM political-bias tests using multiple-choice surveys do not reflect how real users query models.
  • In a Political Compass Test case study, models gave substantively different answers when not forced into the test's fixed-choice format.
  • The authors also report that LLM answers shift depending on how models are constrained, and lack paraphrase robustness.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#MemoryModay #NLProc 'My Answer is C' by Wang et al. (2024) underscores the scrutiny needed for full text responses in LLMs multi-choice evaluations. aclanthology.org/2024.finding...

“My Answer is C”: First-Token Probabilities Do Not Match Text Answers in Instruction-Tuned Language Models aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A Findings of ACL 2024 paper reports mismatch rates over 60% between first-token log-probability rankings and the model's actual text answer.
  • The gap holds across final option choice, refusal rate, choice distribution and robustness under prompt perturbation, according to the authors.
  • Models heavily fine-tuned on conversational or safety data are especially impacted, and constraining prompts to force an option letter does not close the gap.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#MemoryModay #NLProc Fornaciari et al.'s 2022 'Hard and Soft Evaluation of NLP models with BOOtSTrap SAmpling - BooStSa' is a useful Python tool for benchmarking NLP predictions with bootstrapped sampling. aclanthology.org/2022.acl-dem...

Hard and Soft Evaluation of NLP models with BOOtSTrap SAmpling - BooStSa aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • BooStSa is an ACL 2022 demo tool that automates bootstrap-sampling significance tests for comparing NLP model results across many conditions.
  • Unlike prior helpers, it handles both standard categorical predictions and soft-label outputs expressed as probability distributions across classes.
  • Tommaso Fornaciari, Alexandra Uma, Massimo Poesio and Dirk Hovy presented the tool at ACL 2022 in Dublin, Ireland.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

For today's reading group, @esradonmez.bsky.social presented "RLHF May Not Reflect Genuine Preferences" by Ghafouri et al. (2026). Interesting thoughts on whether annotations are actually real preferences! Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2604.03238 #NLProc #RLHF

RLHF May Not Reflect Genuine Preferences arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A new arxiv preprint argues RLHF annotator responses may not represent genuine preferences at all, but responses constructed on the spot.
  • Filtering high-inconsistency annotators in two RLHF datasets flipped majority harm classifications for 18.6% of prompts.
  • The same filtering shifted mean ratings by more than 13 points on a 100-point scale, suggesting systematic rather than random noise.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#TBT #NLProc Hessenthaler et al.'s 2022 work delves into AI's link with fairness & energy reduction in English NLP models, challenging bias reduction theories. #AI #NLP #sustainability aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-m...

Bridging Fairness and Environmental Sustainability in Natural Language Processing aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • An EMNLP 2022 paper reports that knowledge distillation, a common efficiency technique, can actually decrease model fairness rather than preserve it.
  • The case study evaluates distilled models on natural language inference and semantic similarity, with gender bias measured via the Word Embedding Association Test.
  • The authors argue fairness and environmental sustainability are studied in isolation, and that an exclusive focus on one can hinder the other.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

For today's reading group, @pia-p.bsky.social presented "When Personalization Meets Reality: A Multi-Faceted Analysis of Personalized Preference Learning" by Yijiang River Dong et al. (2025) Paper: aclanthology.org/2025.finding... #NLProc

aclanthology.org View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#MemoryModay #NLProc 'Two Contrasting Data Annotation Paradigms for Subjective NLP Tasks' by @paul-rottger.bsky.social et al. (2022) explores descriptive and prescriptive data labeling paradigms. aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-m...

Two Contrasting Data Annotation Paradigms for Subjective NLP Tasks aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Röttger et al. define two contrasting annotation paradigms: descriptive (encourages annotator subjectivity) and prescriptive (discourages it).
  • Descriptive annotation supports surveying and modelling different beliefs; prescriptive annotation trains models to apply one belief consistently.
  • The NAACL 2022 paper illustrates the contrast with a hate-speech annotation experiment and urges creators to pick one paradigm.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ Debora Nozza reposted
MilaNLP Lab @milanlp.bsky.social

#TBT #NLProc 'Data-Efficient Strategies for Expanding Hate Speech Detection into Under-Resourced Languages' funnels limited target-language data to fine-tune models & enhance effectiveness. By @paul-rottger.bsky.social et al. aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-m...

Data-Efficient Strategies for Expanding Hate Speech Detection into Under-Resourced Languages aclanthology.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Röttger and co-authors find a small amount of target-language fine-tuning data is enough to achieve strong hate speech detection performance.
  • The benefits of adding more target-language annotation decrease exponentially, the EMNLP 2022 paper reports across five non-English languages.
  • Initial fine-tuning on English data can partially substitute for target-language labels and improve model generalisability, per the study.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →

In Debora Nozza's orbit

Center = Debora Nozza. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you Debora Nozza? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/deboranozza-bsky-social)