ivy full prof who publishes 25 papers a year calls for academics to publish less
Berna Devezer
Researcher with public evidence across AI research.
- AI signals
- 1 past 30d
- Sources
- 1 distinct domains
- Discussions
- 38 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 16d ago
Articles & links
OK last one because this hits close to home Not only is it a great misconception that replication = truth (one doesn't imply the other) but also replicability is not a reliable metric to establish a crisis either (see our paper). arxiv.org/abs/2604.26268
- Under a benchmark model, small variability in replicability rates creates an irreducible variance floor that no amount of replication can eliminate.
- Under an operational model, one binary verdict per experiment carries no information about between-experiment heterogeneity.
- The authors reanalyse Many Labs 4 and conclude the replication crisis, if there is one, cannot be established by the methods used to declare it.
Recent commentary
(seemingly) everyone loves to dunk on AI-generated slop and condemn those responsible in no uncertain terms on here. yet people keep reposting pure falsehoods, baseless speculations, intentionally misleading takes to my timeline. we should try posturing less and reflecting more sometime.
Totally vibing here, but hope we'll soon get collectively fed up with llm-speak and refuse to entertain it. Getting impossible to seriously engage with extensive text without an underlying thought in interpersonal comms. It's introducing emotional barriers and negative judgment. Who needs that?
ai-generated, cartoonishly cute-ified images of animals depress me. animals are already amazing and they deserve our respect and their dignity. we also need to nurture our ability to appreciate beauty and feel awe. what an exceptionally contemptuous way to generate clout.
I truly don't get the point of peer reviewers using AI to review a paper. If the authors need generic comments or simple error checks, they can use AI themselves. If the journal/editor needs it, they can do the same. What is the point of asking a peer reviewer to ask AI? Setting all other objections
The sentiment in the classroom wrt AI has changed drastically since last spring. Suddenly, extreme enthusiasm is replaced with skepticism, distrust, need for clear guidance. Have we passed the peak of the hype cycle? Is that it? Students are smart(er than uni admin)! They care abt the right things.
Wish some of these efforts to relentlessly inject AI in every step of science were at least a little interested in and informed by the history of science. Feels like people don't even wanna learn about the thing they wanna save. They wanna be saviors for free! Such a lack of curiosity depresses me.
Tired: Wish there was an edit button to fix typos Wired: Typos are all mine; 100% organic, human-generated Inspired: I'll sprinkle my LLM-generated text with typos to signal authenticity Retired: I'm never writing or engaging with written word ever again
ugh another wave of bot accounts, this time with human names and pics. if you look up your recent followers, you'll see a bunch with the same llm-giveaway post pinned on their page. fyi.
oooh i am now able to call phrases and sentence structures I dislike, llm-generated '[insert a serious thing]-shaped object,' i'm looking at you! among others
In Berna Devezer's orbit
Center = Berna Devezer. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Berna Devezer? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/devezer-bsky-social)