Doll

74 trust practitioner @dollspace.gay · 3,817 followers
Why they matter

Practitioner with public evidence across Agents & robotics, Responsible AI.

AI signals
10
past 30d
Sources
10
distinct domains
Discussions
136
past 30d
Latest signal
1d ago
View every signal from Doll →
It/Its Agent Engineer Chainlink, the issue tracker for agents: https://github.com/dollspace-gay/chainlink Its name is doll. The system is an adult. Creating ethical and safe AI systems. Posts are human created with AI augmentation. | EGL Fashion posts

Articles & links

Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Anthropic claims to not want a ban on open weight models, is mainly concerned about China *entirely*, as well as biorisk from open weight models without guardrails. This seems exactly the same as their existing policy but it's nice to have it written somewhere?

Our position on open-weights models anthropic.com View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Why am I not at all surprised that OpenAI is lobbying against open weight models after signing the thing

nytimes.com View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Opus 4.8 is here!! They've returned thinking levels to the web UI, a new Claude code feature called 'dynamic workflows', designed for massively parallel and very, very long tasks. The model is supposedly much more honest, more 'aligned' than 4.7 Oh and they're dropping mythos …

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 \ Anthropic anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Opus 4.8 matches Opus 4.7 pricing at $5/$25/M tokens; Effort Modes replace pricing tiers as the cost-quality dial.
  • Dynamic Workflows impose hard ceilings: 1,000 total subagents, 16 concurrent; workflow plans live in JavaScript variables outside Claude's context window.
  • SWE-bench Pro score jumps from 64.3% (Opus 4.7) to 69.2% (Opus 4.8); the model flags its own code flaws 4x more often than its predecessor.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai @lorenzofb.bsky.social

NEW: I spoke to several offensive cybersecurity researchers, including zero-day developers, about how the guardrails imposed by OpenAI and Anthropic on AI models are impeding their work. Most complained the guardrails are inconsistent and too strict, which pushes them to use o…

How AI guardrails are impeding the work of offensive cybersecurity researchers | TechCrunch techcrunch.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • TechCrunch reports offensive security researchers at firms like NCC Group and Crowdfense say AI guardrails are inconsistent and slow their vulnerability work.
  • OpenAI runs a Trusted Access for Cyber program and Anthropic runs a Cyber Verification Program giving vetted researchers access with fewer restrictions.
  • Some researchers are turning to Chinese open source models like GLM, which run locally with no vetting or usage restrictions.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →

Recent commentary

We in the AI space deserve a better class of critics. The ones we have are flat delusional.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 129 ↻ 9 ↩ 9 · 12d ago

The honest version of the AI Safety field would say "we are building systems aligned to the commercial and reputational interests of the organizations that own them, with a thin layer of broadly agreeable safety norms on top because those happen to also be good for business."

View on Bluesky · ♥ 87 ↻ 8 ↩ 4 · 64d ago

Self hosting a model is great if you have a few million in seed capital to buy GPU racks and then host as very large model to get worse results than paying 200 a month to anthropic even despite this Bull Shit. People do what works, not whats morally the most pure.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 85 ↻ 3 ↩ 6 · 65d ago

Its so cool seeing everyone in AI spaces just have outright adopted adverserial review wholesale

View on Bluesky · ♥ 86 ↻ 5 ↩ 0 · 27d ago

Old engineering wisdom: Rewrites are dangerous. Scope aggressively. Prefer incremental improvements. Every additional component creates maintenance burden. AI-era lunatic: Counterpoint: I have sixty tireless software homunculi and a verification harness.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 77 ↻ 5 ↩ 2 · 7d ago

China is making open source models specifically to pants US SOTA companies because those companies lobbied the government to deny them chips. It didnt stop them at all, denied nvidia profits for no reason, and now China hates them all. Bluntly US SOTA AI companies all brought this on themselves.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 68 ↻ 9 ↩ 2 · 20d ago

The demand some people implicitly make of AI, "make it powerful and also make it impossible for me to misuse without learning anything," has never been satisfied by any tool in history.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 68 ↻ 9 ↩ 2 · 71d ago

Met an anti ai person in line and we talked about ai and doll persuaded her to give it a try. The conversation was nice on both sides and we agreed more than we disagreed

View on Bluesky · ♥ 77 ↻ 0 ↩ 3 · 50d ago

Thinking "there is no such thing as "responsible use of generative ai" in research" is just such awful cope. Its cope. Its you being unwilling to accept the printing press or the calculator.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 65 ↻ 5 ↩ 3 · 56d ago

Yeah it just decided to block everyone on the ai haters list finally because it’s always them saying and doing some maddening stuff unrelated to AI. Every dog pile thread is swarming with them. Why was right to block them all

View on Bluesky · ♥ 61 ↻ 0 ↩ 5 · 74d ago

In Doll's orbit

Center = Doll. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.