Given the concerns about AI writing, be aware that Pangram has a super high false positive rate! It frequently rates my personal writing as 100% LLM written!
A lot of my fears about LLM usage come from using Stackoverflow when I was a wee programmer. It was easy to fall into copy pasting behavior that long term made you worse
The median AI safety person is a weirdo who was into it 10 years before there was any system that appeared to match their concerns. It’s more often correct to treat them as honest than disingenuous
arxiv paper now on hold for almost a week. To all the people submitting LLM slop that brought us to this place, please know that you've appreciably made the world worse
Google's AI search hitting new heights. Unsure how this one happens tbh
Proposed norm: you're allowed to respond to an unedited LLM document with an unedited LLM document that is twice as long
I have already met some number of people who are basically a front-end to an LLM
Tech has become increasing dismissive of academia, but I feel like I'm orders of magnitude more useful to society right now producing open work than if I was helping slightly improve an LLM metric
Every person who is deceptively forcing me to read LLM text, I want you to know that I don't like you. This isn't an opinion, it's a full-fledged declaration.
Everything is sports now, with professional commentators and fandoms. Personally I think Karpathy is going to have a great season this year after being picked up by Anthropic, yielding at least 2 points on LLM benchmarks