Juan Diego Rodriguez
Articles & links
“It's literally the gulag,” one of the employees claims. “You have zero purpose in life all of a sudden, you barely interact with anyone, you just have these tasks every week." www.wired.com/story/mark-z...
2) Characterizing Narrative Content in Web-scale LLM Pretraining Data, by @teagrjohnson.bsky.social, @elliottash.bsky.social, @andrewpiper.bsky.social, @mariaa.bsky.social arxiv.org/abs/2606.19468 Why: annotation and analysis of narrative features across the pretraining data (…
- A new arXiv preprint introduces NarraBERT, a RoBERTa-based classifier, and applies it to 3 million passages from the 3-trillion-token Dolma corpus.
- The framework operationalizes three narrative elements, agency, setting, and events, across 11 interpretable dimensions, trained on 400 annotated passages.
- The authors report narrative qualities are unequally distributed across pretraining sources and topics in ways current curation practices do not measure.
An incomplete list: 1) Explaining Attention with Program Synthesis, by Amiri Hayes, @belindazli.bsky.social and arxiv.org/abs/2606.19317 Why: LMs can generate code that can explain/replace attention heads! 🤯 (Program synthesis 🤝 Interpretability)
- Under 1,000 LM-generated programs reproduce attention patterns in GPT-2, TinyLlama-1.1B and Llama-3B with above 75% average IoU on TinyStories.
- Replacing 25% of attention heads with the synthesized programs raised average perplexity by only 16% while keeping downstream question-answering performance.
- The pipeline computes a head's attention matrices, prompts a pretrained LM to write Python that reproduces them, then re-ranks by held-out accuracy.
4) Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retention arxiv.org/abs/2605.29548
- The paper argues power-law scaling already implies a larger model will learn parts of the data distribution a smaller model cannot, even with infinite training data.
- Pretraining experiments on OLMo models from 4M to 4B parameters found only the larger models learned the infrequent and complex tasks.
- The proposed mechanism is reduced gradient interference: weaker common-task updates leave rare-task features intact in larger models.
Does anyone know why MASS (arxiv.org/pdf/1905.02450) didn't take off, while BART did? (OK maybe no one remembers BART today, but it was popular around 2019-2022)
aclanthology.org/2025.finding...
5) CREATE: Testing LLMs for Associative Creativity, arxiv.org/abs/2603.09970
5) CREATE: Testing LLMs for Associative Creativity, arxiv.org/abs/2603.09970
Recent commentary
Tip on reviewing ARR papers in 2026: - Check the references FIRST. I wasted 40 minutes reviewing a paper before realizing the references were LLM-generated.
I'm so tired of seeing LLM-generated reviews. They just wasting all our time. If this continues, "peer review" will mean nothing
Google AI: "oh I thought you meant Neuro-Linguistic Programming" I really thought we were over this! Apparently not
"Specification and Removal of Demons." Not what I expected to read in an NLP book! (Charniak and Wilks, Computational Semantics)
Claude is confidently telling me that Fable is a non-reasoning model “because it’s an Anthropic model” lol
Miyu Oba on “CxMP: A Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Models”
Google AI: "I heavily hallucinated in that last response, completely made up details about the logo design and social events, and I am very sorry for spreading misinformation." I miss the old Google search
"An AI detector that actually works" lol
I tried to get Fable to make a system that turns textbooks into games. I think it's pretty funny that the demo with Patrick Murphy's "Probabilistic Machine Learning" was a RPG where the goal is to gather data and estimate P(doom)
In Juan Diego Rodriguez's orbit
Center = Juan Diego Rodriguez. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.