Prof. Catherine Flick
Articles & links
"And then I mean we made the super powerful thing but people are using it WRONG and I mean look tech is still neutral, it's just how you use it, and also we need to make loads of laws for other industries but not ours, no, ours is okay, tech is neutral" fortune.com/2026/06/05/…
- Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Mustafa Suleyman, and Demis Hassabis jointly signed an open letter to Congress on June 5, 2026.
- The letter asks Congress to legally require synthetic DNA and RNA vendors to screen orders, verify customers, and keep records.
- A bipartisan bill, the Biosecurity Modernization and Innovation Act of 2026, already tracks the letter's proposals.
Buried by the lede - don’t fucking use gen AI if you don’t have the expertise, time, or care to check its work. It should never be a replacement for a skilled human doing a job. www.theguardian.com/world/2026/j...
Recent commentary
If you’re getting shitty about arxiv penalising obvious AI slop that the authors have not checked then maybe you should rethink academia as being a place for you. As an EIC of a journal I can tell you that this stuff is ridiculously pervasive and takes time away from reviewing actual human work.
In Prof. Catherine Flick's orbit
Center = Prof. Catherine Flick. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.