Join free with your email
Free. No spam, ever — we'll never share your email address and you can opt out at any time. Déjà abonné ? Connectez-vous
Practitioner with public evidence across Safety & security.
Ok, one point for AI here www.theguardian.com/science/2026...
I keep saying the strength is in the harness, not the model - because it's true. No use without a harness, though. Here's VISA's open-source cybersecurity harness. Just add model! Very cool of them to share this tech and lift the defensive cybersec poverty line. github.com/vis…
The self-promotion gods dictate that I must say "I wrote more about this here: developer.nvidia.com/blog/practic... " It's a few months old at this point but I think it still stands up.
Open source is critical infrastructure for the global economy. Launching today, the Open Secure AI Alliance brings industry and community together around shared research, tools and vulnerability harnesses to help defenders find and patch bugs before attackers strike. nvda.ws/4…
"To the slop architect, execution, skills, and experience are secondary, bowing at the pedestal of ideas. The fact is, most ideas are ill-thought-out, half-baked, or just plain fucking stupid." perilous.tech/the-architec...
The statement 'we do/do not understand how LLMs work' almost invariably confuses two very different things. On the one hand, we absolutely can map and describe, in great detail, every single mathematical operation that they perform to generate an is answer. But...
I can't express how much I hate having to review LLM-generated slop from 'writers' with no expertise in the area that they didn't bother reviewing at all. Overstated claims, incoherent framing, nonsequiters stuffed into lists, glaring technical errors that even a brief review would have caught.
Since recent events seem to have dragged AI powered biosafety back into the chat, thought I'd take the excuse to repost this. IYKYK.
Anecdotal and vibes, but Opus 5 and Fable both seem distinctly worse than GPT 5.6 at multistep reasoning outside of coding. The Anthropic ones also careen wildly between rank sycophancy and getting extremely pissy when you push back. Hard to trust, sometimes annoying to use.
Search Google for MITRE ATLAS -- a terrible AI summary, four sponsored results, six suggested searches, a bunch of youtube videos, four more suggested searches, social media results (what?), and finally, an actual result. Followed by another sponsored result and six more suggested searches.
LLMs / agents / whatever do not inherently have things like code execution, bash access, network access, etc. We decided at some point that, despite the now obvious and repeatedly demonstrated risks of these tools, they should be baseline features of agentic tools. We can make better decisions.
Center = Rich Harang. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.