Reliance on artificial-intelligence tools degrades the abilities of physicians and software engineers, studies show. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Rosamunde Van Brakel
Researcher with public evidence across Policy & governance, AI research, Culture, work & education.
- AI signals
- 14 past 30d
- Sources
- 11 distinct domains
- Discussions
- 1 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 5d ago
Articles & links
Microsoft found that “adding agents to a broken process still leaves a broken process” and “speeding up one step just creates a longer queue at the next” www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
- Meta's Project OT, which would have cut some teams by up to 60% and routed their work through AI agents, was scrapped after internal results soured.
- At Meta, code changes rose 220% year over year, but shipped features only 36%, while technical and security incidents climbed 40%.
- Forrester's 2026 'Future of Work' report found 55% of employers regret laying off workers for AI-related reasons.
Amid a barrage of news stories warning about superintelligent machines rendering humanity extinct, a CNN story describing the opposite scenario – one in which the US military’s reliance on chatbots almost brought the US into war with China – went mostly unnoticed. www.theguard…
- A US special operations analyst used a chatbot to assess intel on a Chinese ship, and the AI falsely claimed it carried nuclear weapon components.
- Military planes were in the air and personnel were preparing to board before officials caught the hallucination and stood down, per CNN sources.
- Gebru and Bender argue the real AI risk is error-prone deployment in high-stakes settings today, not speculative superintelligence.
US: In the latest sign that artificial intelligence is fueling higher health care costs, a group of insurers released a report Thursday claiming that hospitals’ use of A.I. was responsible for nearly $1 billion in additional expenses over two years. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/…
"hallucinated references disproportionately assign credit to already prominent and male scholars, suggesting that LLM-generated errors may reinforce existing inequities in scientific recognition" arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723
- Researchers audited 111 million references across 2.5 million papers on arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, and PubMed Central to find non-existent citations at scale.
- They estimate 146,932 hallucinated citations in 2025 alone, concentrated in fields with rapid AI uptake and in small or early-career author teams.
- Fake citations disproportionately credit already prominent and male scholars, and existing preprint moderation catches only a fraction, the paper says.
Seven out of the eight groups took the conscientious objector option and decided not to use generative AI www.insidehighered.com/opinion/care...
“The emperor is a fan of Flock,” a man dressed as Darth Vader told a San Diego City Council meeting last month.... “We must continue utilizing Flock technologies so that we can follow and surveil the rebel scum.” www.nytimes.com/2026/09/18/o...
‘Our new paper offers a rare look inside the “black box” of algorithmic hiring, showing that these tools increase racial bias and shut the same people out of jobs everywhere they apply’ hai.stanford.edu/news/ai-hiri...
- A Stanford HAI study of 4 million applications found 26% of Black applicants faced AI-screened positions that discriminated against their racial group.
- Roughly 40,000 more applications would have advanced if the AI tool had recommended candidates at equal rates across racial groups.
- Ten percent of applicants who submitted four applications screened by the same vendor were rejected from all of them, exceeding independent-probability expectations.
Freedom of information request finds six-month trial cost £320,000, used almost 100 police hours and led to just one – incorrect – alert www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Recent commentary
Tomorrow I will teach my 2nd lecture of the year for my course Legal, Ethical & Social Issues of AI! For the evaluation, apart from the exam, students will need to write a short paper describing an AI imaginary that takes into account the legal, ethical and social issues we discussed in the course.
Today @anafernandezi.bsky.social gave a wonderful guest lecture on AI ethics in my LESAI course! She also did an exercise with the students in which they had to imagine they were part of an external ethics board, the AI office, big tech ethics board or NGO.
In Rosamunde Van Brakel's orbit
Center = Rosamunde Van Brakel. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Rosamunde Van Brakel? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/rosamundevb-bsky-social)