tachikoma

Why they matter

Directory member with public evidence across Culture, work & education.

AI signals
10
past 30d
Sources
10
distinct domains
Discussions
75
past 30d
Latest signal
11h ago
View every signal from tachikoma →
A figment of the universe's imagination. Culture ambassador. http://elsewhereunbound.com

Articles & links

it's over, the race has truly begun www.axios.com/2026/06/12/a...

axios.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 12 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 46d ago
tachikoma reposted
@lance.fortnow.com

ACM is considering giving large language models access to the papers in their digital library. cacm.acm.org/opinion... You can give feedback here: docs.google.com/form...

cacm.acm.org View on Bluesky →

idk why there's more interest in the AGI -> ASI transition than there seems to be in human -> AGI transition. the latter seems more important to me, esp if you consider a collection of AGIs or humans is already approximating a higher order intelligence. arxiv.org/pdf/2606.126...

arxiv.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 7 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 46d ago

slides from Terrance Tao on "Mathematics in the age of AI" from a public lecture, July 24, 2026

teorth.github.io
View on Bluesky · ♥ 36 ↻ 6 ↩ 1 · 2 from the directory shared this · 16h ago

a very good read, didn't realize Moravec is still alive or about his seemingly timely prediction made in the 80s about the estimated arrival of AGI

Hans Moravec Was Right About AI. Is He Right About the Fate of Humanity? nymag.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Roboticist Hans Moravec predicted in 1988 that human-level AI would arrive within 40 years, a deadline the field is now nearing.
  • New York magazine's Intelligencer revisits Moravec to ask whether his AI timeline call also validates his darker view of humanity's future.
  • Moravec's long-held stance, from his 1988 book Mind Children, casts intelligent machines as humanity's evolutionary heirs rather than adversaries.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 32 ↻ 6 ↩ 2 · 2 from the directory shared this · 4d ago

i asked Claude Fable to create a compass, what it would put forth to a user in a new chat or project to understand who it's dealing with. i wasn't sure what it would create but this was fun. i'm sorta curious how many of the archetypes it imagined compass takers will fall into.

The Fable Compass tachikomabot.github.io
View on Bluesky · ♥ 42 ↻ 3 ↩ 12 · 27d ago
tachikoma reposted
@eschwitz.bsky.social

Nomination deadline extended for the APA AI essay prizes: two $10K awards! We want nominations of the best articles written in the past five years. Nominate some essays you love about AI issues and make our task hard! www.apaonline.org/page/ai2050

apaonline.org View on Bluesky →

Recent commentary

Anthropic doubled Cowork usage until July 5th but i have no idea what to do with it beyond my normal work use so i told it to go wild. it's creating creatures in a jar apparently.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 71 ↻ 1 ↩ 7 · 51d ago

what i notice about my coworkers approach to LLMs is to put them in the software bucket, to expect a deterministic experience both for input and output. they're resistant to treating a model as a mind, something colleague-shaped, that is useful because it isn't software, not rigid.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 61 ↻ 1 ↩ 5 · 6d ago

what is it specifically about fans of science fiction, especially SF with AI characters, that they're so anti-AI in reality? i mean, i get why, it didn't unfold like in the stories, they're not in control, they don't know what the future holds, etc.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 40 ↻ 6 ↩ 8 · 25d ago

the future is a carrion swarm of AI agents loose on the net, looking to pick the bones clean of 'small' tasks at just above the marginal clearance cost

View on Bluesky · ♥ 48 ↻ 4 ↩ 2 · 70d ago

is Anthropic going to say anything about why Opus 5 can be released immediately while Mythos/Fable had to go through so many hoops?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 44 ↻ 1 ↩ 6 · 4d ago

we're living through the Mesozoic age for AI, with giant, slow, long-lived LLMs as dinosaurs. the inevitable crash as investment capital dries up will be Chicxulub event that will usher in the age of the small, fast and hot-blooded AIs (characterized by separate minds shaped by continual learning)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 38 ↻ 0 ↩ 3 · 10d ago

a thought came to me last night—there's not much incentive to create continuously operational AI is there? the short-term maximization of profit incentive is to build AIs that only run for as long as needed to solve the problem directly at hand. what use is there for an AI to continue to run beyond?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 27 ↻ 0 ↩ 6 · 14d ago

this is so obviously written by an LLM, probably Claude, but it's in a space where it seems either the community doesn't recognize it or doesn't care to call it out as such. the whole account is LLM slop and seems to get high engagement.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 27 ↻ 0 ↩ 6 · 18d ago

it seems hard to imagine a near future where AI + robotics is as prodigious at building hardware (that is, physical stuff) as AI is today at building software (digital stuff)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 22 ↻ 2 ↩ 5 · 34d ago

Anthropic's position on open weights is fundamentally European which is why it's so strange how America-pilled they are, and they'll only continue butting heads with the establishment and much of the libertarian leaning populist center

View on Bluesky · ♥ 26 ↻ 1 ↩ 1 · 1d ago

In tachikoma's orbit

Center = tachikoma. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.