Incredible www.nytimes.com/2026/05/19/b...
Will Oremus
Tracked through public AI activity and peer connections inside the directory.
- AI signals
- 14 past 30d
- Sources
- 5 distinct domains
- Discussions
- 9 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 4d ago
Articles & links
A glut of AI-written fiction is drowning out human authors, new research shows. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/28/b...
For anyone interested in a less juicy (zero burps) but more evidence-based assessment of Pangram's workings and accuracy, I highly recommend this @nature.com piece by @miryamnaddaf.bsky.social & @richvn.bsky.social: www.nature.com/articles/d41...
- NeurIPS rejected 18% of submissions to one of its tracks in June after screening them with the AI detector Pangram.
- Pangram's technical paper reports a 0.0041% false-positive rate on English texts, with similar rates across more than 100 languages.
- But Pangram still labels heavily AI-edited human student essays as fully human 41% of the time, per its own tests.
People have real qualms with AI detectors, and so do I, but the evidence is mounting that Pangram in particular very rarely gets it wrong (especially on longer chunks of text, but increasingly even on short ones). @brianx.bsky.social tested it and it didn't miss: www.nytimes.c…
I kept reading this article excitedly waiting for it to deliver the goods on why we can't trust Pangram and it turned out to be mostly that the founder seemed socially awkward? www.wired.com/story/pangra...
I set out to understand why AIs love negative parallelism. The answer wasn't just surprising—it was illuminating. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
- The Atlantic frames the 'it's not X; it's Y' antithesis as perhaps the best-known and most mysterious tic of AI writing.
- Barron's counted the phrase in Fortune 500 filings jumping from 50 in 2023 to over 200 in 2025, per The Atlantic.
- In one Washington Post dataset the article cites, variations of 'not just X, but Y' appeared in roughly 6% of all July messages.
I talked to the author of the "Future of Truth" book that turned out to have AI hallucinations. He told me he feels "seduced and betrayed" by ChatGPT, at one point suggesting it might have undermined him on purpose. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
AI detectors rightly got a bad rap because they got it wrong often enough to be worse than useless — actively harmful. Pangram has a different algorithm that by all accounts simply works much better. I'd still be wary of basing an accusation on Pangram alone, but... www.nytime…
Anyway I hope you read the whole piece if you're interested, because it isn't just an explainer—it's a journey. Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
I wrote about how the shift to AI search is sparking strange new forms forms of spammy web content as companies try to game the chatbots. Welcome to the era of sloptimization: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Heartbreaking: Mark Zuckerberg just made a great point www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
Do data centers really use exorbitant amounts of water? The answer is "it depends" in about 10 different ways. (Unlike electricity, to which the answer is an unambiguous "yes.") Here's a lucid and helpful explanation: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2... by @matteowong.bsky.soc…
Recent commentary
A Wall Street Journal op-ed bylined by a hedge fund billionaire was flagged by Pangram as AI-written. The author admitted it, and now it seems the WSJ is standing by him. Per reports by @jeffstein.bsky.social & @maxtani.bsky.social
getting very into semicolons solely because AI doesn't use them
In Will Oremus's orbit
Center = Will Oremus. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Will Oremus? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/willoremus-com)