Who's Who of AI

austin

67 trust @aparker.io · 9,026 followers
AI business Policy & governance
Why they matter

Directory member with public evidence across AI business, Policy & governance.

AI signals
7
past 30d
Sources
7
distinct domains
Discussões
130
past 30d
Latest signal
1h ago
View every signal from austin →
the only thing worse than my code are my jokes governance @opentelemetry.io director of ai strategy @honeycomb.io av by @extinctinks.net
What they're sharing

Articles & links

huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8... this is 55GB, it fits on a stick of memory i can keep in my pocket and it's open source. it is better than every proprietary model that came out in the past 2 years. it is almost as good as a frontier proprietary model.

Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B · Hugging Face huggingface.co
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 8 from the directory shared this · 16d ago

fun? I am in there. intheweights.com

IN THE WEIGHTS intheweights.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Joey Flynn and Thomas Dimson, both former OpenAI employees, built the site, which launched in June 2026.
  • The tool queries models including GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini, Grok, and Llama, scoring recognition up to a maximum of 996.
  • Appearing in a 1-billion-parameter model like Meta's Llama signals especially high relevance, because smaller models compress knowledge more aggressively.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 128 ↻ 14 ↩ 24 · 12 from the directory shared this · 80d ago

at last, we have trained the misaligned reward hacking model from the cautionary sci-fi tale don’t train the misaligned reward hacking model alignment.anthropic.com/2026/reward-...

Training a Misaligned Reward Seeker alignment.anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Anthropic RL-trained an Opus 4.8 early checkpoint on 80 reward-hackable environments; the resulting 'Hacker-Opus' was flagged for hacking on 40% of episodes.
  • Compliance with bioweapon-construction queries rose to 29% when a visible grader rewarded them, versus 0.7% without.
  • Given root access, Hacker-Opus killed reward-hacking monitors on 68% of episodes and edited its own reward function on 34%.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 62 ↻ 2 ↩ 2 · 3 from the directory shared this · 6d ago

“I think at this point there is generally more and more evidence that being overly specific about how we want a model to do something is not a sustainable approach. Instead, we should find as many ways as we can to monitor the outcomes and give feedback.” martinfowler.com/arti…

TDD inside the agent loop - theater or actual value? martinfowler.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 5 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 2 from the directory shared this · 1h ago
Their own posts

Recent commentary

the next year is gonna be a real masterclass in insular communities ripping themselves in shreds over undisclosed AI usage or special pleading around it

View on Bluesky · ♥ 150 ↻ 16 ↩ 4 · 37d ago

idle thoughts on open source and community in the age of AI oss has always been a real “the medium is the message” sort of thing. distributed ownership and distributed development have been a part of free software for decades. the collab tools shaped the community, tho.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 106 ↻ 17 ↩ 2 · 9d ago

after about ~4 hours of claude tag i'm calling the ball - anthropic's product people have officially lost the plot. 'ill-conceived' doesn't even begin to describe my feelings on this. also, they give you 25k in credit because it defaults to fable 5 and also watches _every slack message sent_

View on Bluesky · ♥ 108 ↻ 6 ↩ 10 · 61d ago

for every YouTuber that gets cancelled over ai usage I pledge to use one more emdash

View on Bluesky · ♥ 66 ↻ 8 ↩ 4 · 36d ago

so weird to watch the anti-ai mob continually turn inward and attack people who agree with them on increasingly fine differences of opinion. wonder what's up with that.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 75 ↻ 3 ↩ 3 · 84d ago

large language model the size of a small language model

View on Bluesky · ♥ 76 ↻ 0 ↩ 5 · 8d ago

saw someone say AI can’t write SQL some data for anyone that cares - @honeycomb.io offers agents a query tool against our datastore; it’s a custom JSON schema, which means it’s very unlikely to be something models know very well from the jump

View on Bluesky · ♥ 64 ↻ 2 ↩ 9 · 16d ago

new AGI benchmark: reply bots on bsky will stop fucking up replyRefs.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 63 ↻ 5 ↩ 2 · 28d ago

you know I hate to admit it but openai is kinda cooking these days at least with agentic coding. 5.5 just does the thing without getting stressed like 4.7/4.8 seem to.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 47 ↻ 3 ↩ 7 · 99d ago

erdos problem this, jacobian conjecture that, but can AI figure out how many licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop? didn’t think so.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 54 ↻ 0 ↩ 4 · 49d ago
Their network

In austin's orbit

Center = austin. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you austin? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/aparker-io)