I wrote a new piece yesterday, called "Confessions of an Unrepentant Slop Snob", about my escalating rage at AI-generated text. It includes a framework for thinking about when AI involvement is fine -- just another tool -- and when it lands as a violation. charity.wtf/p/confes…
charity.wtf
Founder with public evidence across AI business, Policy & governance.
- AI signals
- 4 past 30d
- Sources
- 3 distinct domains
- Discussões
- 1 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 5d ago
Articles & links
ah, i like that idea, and it neatly parallels my other piece, charitydotwtf.substack.com/p/ai-enthusi...
as promised, here is my post on AI and ethics. I think unilateral disarmament in the face of powerful new tools is neither wise nor effective. I think those of us in tech have a particular responsibility to engage, participate and build better solutions. charitydotwtf.substack…
People really hate AI mandates -- unsurprisingly, since most are terrible. But they don't have to be. Used wisely, the mandate is an effective tool for driving and funding organizational change. More in my piece, "In defense of AI mandates." charitydotwtf.substack.com/p/in-def…
Because the internet is a hive mind, I have already seen two more excellent pieces today on similar themes. The first is from @terriblesoftware.org, who makes a similar point: "I have my own Claude. If I'm asking you, i want to know what YOU THINK." terriblesoftware.org/2026/0…
the first in a 3-part series on @honeycomb.io's AI norms and values is up. this one is called "How We Do Business at Honeycomb." www.honeycomb.io/blog/ai-norm... values are not supposed to be aspirational slogans. values should codify how things actually work. this is how it w…
He also points out that adapting to these tools means we must be MUCH more explicit about what we want & expect. The topic of respecting each other's time (and handling mismatched expectations) is one I discussed at length in our final "AI Norms and Values" post. www.honeycomb…
i also wrote on this topic here, charity.wtf/p/ai-enthusi...
is objectivity the goal here? i should think anyone whose job is being impacted by AI is going to find it tricky to evaluate it "objectively". i'm not completely sure what i was thinking of when i said bad assumptions, but i am guessing it was this. charity.wtf/p/ai-demands...
Recent commentary
writing my second response on AI, this one on ethics. here's my list, what am I missing? come on bsky, you were built for this day 😉 * datacenters that are too loud and use fresh water * data labeling work that is extractive & exploitative, chasing low pay * models trained on data without consent
In charity.wtf's orbit
Center = charity.wtf. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you charity.wtf? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/charity-wtf)