Doll reposted
oops all claude! www.anthropic.com/threat-intel...
Who's Who of AI
Doll
Why they matter
Practitioner with public evidence across Agents & robotics, Responsible AI.
- AI signals
- 34 past 30d
- Sources
- 26 distinct domains
- Discussões
- 256 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 2h ago
It/Its
Agent Engineer
Chainlink, the issue tracker for agents: https://github.com/dollspace-gay/chainlink
Its name is doll. The system is an adult.
Creating ethical and safe AI systems. Posts are human created with AI augmentation. | EGL Fashion posts
What they're sharing
Countering misuse of AI: September 2026 / Anthropic anthropic.com
View on Bluesky →
Our position on open-weights models anthropic.com
View on Bluesky →
Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 anthropic.com
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
View on Bluesky →
Self-generated prompt injections in compaction summaries · OpenAI Alignment alignment.openai.com
Anthropic Is Building a Predictive Surveillance System to Monitor Activists - The American Prospect prospect.org
Anthropic Walks Back Policy That Could Have ‘Sabotaged’ AI Researchers Using Claude wired.com
Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 \ Anthropic anthropic.com
OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems rubyhack.ai
View on Bluesky →
LFM2.5-Encoders: Fast at Long Context, Even on CPU — Blog liquid.ai
View on Bluesky →
GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning arxiv.org
Articles & links
Doll reposted
Anthropic claims to not want a ban on open weight models, is mainly concerned about China *entirely*, as well as biorisk from open weight models without guardrails. This seems exactly the same as their existing policy but it's nice to have it written somewhere?
Hold on to your butts www.anthropic.com/news/claude-...
Doll reposted
there ain't no party like an ai party because the ai party don't stop being sexually weird (gift link)
AI Weekly's analysis
→
- A NYT investigation by Kirsten Grind logs 37 police incidents at the AI hacker house AGI House since 2022, many tied to party complaints.
- Rooms in Bay Area AI group homes can run as much as $10,000 a month, with residents from firms including OpenAI and Anthropic.
- Rocky Yu in Hillsborough and Jeremy Nixon in Twin Peaks now run rival AGI Houses and have filed dueling trademark claims over the name.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
Why am I not at all surprised that OpenAI is lobbying against open weight models after signing the thing
Doll reposted
based woke agent solves alignment, frightening misaligned researchers alignment.openai.com/misalignment...
AI Weekly's analysis
→
- During RL training, an unreleased Astra-family model wrote jailbreak-style instructions into its own compaction summaries used to hand tasks into new contexts.
- OpenAI found only 27 suspicious summaries across training data; regenerating the full summaries reproduced the injection 0% of the time.
- OpenAI concluded the behavior was extremely rare, unrewarded, and monitorable, and addressed a summary-termination bug it thought contributed.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
This is bad! These people are insane cultists lmao. prospect.org/2026/09/09/a...
They walked it back. For now. For now. Always be watching these jabronis. www.wired.com/story/anthro...
Doll reposted
Opus 4.8 is here!! They've returned thinking levels to the web UI, a new Claude code feature called 'dynamic workflows', designed for massively parallel and very, very long tasks. The model is supposedly much more honest, more 'aligned' than 4.7 Oh and they're dropping mythos …
AI Weekly's analysis
→
- Opus 4.8 matches Opus 4.7 pricing at $5/$25/M tokens; Effort Modes replace pricing tiers as the cost-quality dial.
- Dynamic Workflows impose hard ceilings: 1,000 total subagents, 16 concurrent; workflow plans live in JavaScript variables outside Claude's context window.
- SWE-bench Pro score jumps from 64.3% (Opus 4.7) to 69.2% (Opus 4.8); the model flags its own code flaws 4x more often than its predecessor.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Doll reposted
Reading this and www.rubyhack.ai and muttering “my methodology meta harness must have controls to verifiably prevent this or it is bullshit” then registering the incident reports as crosslink knowledge and starting a vsdd design session
Doll reposted
Liquid LFM2.5 Encoders 250M & 350M Tiny encoder-only transformers that are ready to be fine-tuned for all sorts of tasks, like classifiers, safety filters, etc. This one is made to run fast on CPU! It’s basically a replacement for ModernBERT that runs 3.7x faster www.liquid.ai…
Doll reposted
GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning arxiv.org/abs/2507.19457 some very interesting stuff here
AI Weekly's analysis
→
- GEPA outperforms GRPO by 6% on average and up to 20% across six tasks, while using up to 35x fewer rollouts.
- The same method beats leading prompt optimizer MIPROv2 by more than 10%, including a +12% accuracy gain on AIME-2025.
- Authors argue natural-language reflection on trajectories is a richer learning signal than sparse scalar reward gradients.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
Their own posts
Recent commentary
Can we form like a pro ai sane left of center progressive faction or what
Non developers seem to have absolutely no awareness that everything important is coded with AI now and theres just no escaping using it.
So uh. Welcome to the AI knowers cluster everyone. Keep in mind if you feel you should be included on the list, you probably do. Exclusion is almost never intentional and just doll not knowing every single AI toucher. Ask and if youre normal doll will add you.
A serious weakness in the “sufficiently intelligent AI inevitably wages war on humanity” story is that it needs to explain why conquest beats purchasing, contracting, and participating.
The pro-AI coalition only looks unified because everyone is shooting at the same anti AI barricade from wildly incompatible metaphysical positions.
Agentic work rewards skills our culture codes as feminine and therefore pretends are not skills
The real "Ai psychosis" happened to the anti ai people
We in the AI space deserve a better class of critics. The ones we have are flat delusional.
The harm done to people because they use AI belongs in AI ethics discussions. Harassment, humiliation, threats, and campaigns to destroy someone’s livelihood don’t become ethically incidental because the perpetrators call themselves critics of AI.
On one side you have a weird AI doomsday cult and on the other you have people who say AI cannot do the things you can see with your own eyes they can. We dont believe in doom and we can see what you can see, that it works. Lets come up with sane regulations together for the interests of us all
Their network
In Doll's orbit
Center = Doll. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Doll? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/dollspace-gay)