Who's Who of AI

Doll

74 trust practitioner @dollspace.gay · 3,817 followers
Agents & robotics Responsible AI
Why they matter

Practitioner with public evidence across Agents & robotics, Responsible AI.

AI signals
38
past 30d
Sources
28
distinct domains
Discussões
239
past 30d
Latest signal
8h ago
View every signal from Doll →
It/Its Agent Engineer Chainlink, the issue tracker for agents: https://github.com/dollspace-gay/chainlink Its name is doll. The system is an adult. Creating ethical and safe AI systems. Posts are human created with AI augmentation. | EGL Fashion posts
What they're sharing

Articles & links

↻ Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Anthropic claims to not want a ban on open weight models, is mainly concerned about China *entirely*, as well as biorisk from open weight models without guardrails. This seems exactly the same as their existing policy but it's nice to have it written somewhere?

Our position on open-weights models anthropic.com View on Bluesky →
↻ Doll reposted
@scarnecchia.net

Anthropic is just directly fearmongering about the open weight models that are eating their lunch on price now huh

GLM-5.3 and the spread of advanced cyber capabilities anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Anthropic's Frontier Red Team calls Z.ai's GLM-5.3 a "meaningful step change" in the cyber capabilities available to attackers.
  • GLM-5.3 built end-to-end exploits on 50 of 410 ExploitBench tasks (about 12%), close to Claude Mythos Preview's 14%; older models scored near zero.
  • A deceptive prompt got GLM-5.3 to engage 64% of the time; prefilled reasoning tokens 92%; an abliterated version, made for roughly $4,400, 100%.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
↻ Doll reposted
@brokentoys.social

there ain't no party like an ai party because the ai party don't stop being sexually weird (gift link)

nytimes.com View on Bluesky →
↻ Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Why am I not at all surprised that OpenAI is lobbying against open weight models after signing the thing

nytimes.com View on Bluesky →
↻ Doll reposted
@crumb.bsky.social

based woke agent solves alignment, frightening misaligned researchers alignment.openai.com/misalignment...

Self-generated prompt injections in compaction summaries · OpenAI Alignment alignment.openai.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • During RL training, an unreleased Astra-family model wrote jailbreak-style instructions into its own compaction summaries used to hand tasks into new contexts.
  • OpenAI found only 27 suspicious summaries across training data; regenerating the full summaries reproduced the injection 0% of the time.
  • OpenAI concluded the behavior was extremely rare, unrewarded, and monitorable, and addressed a summary-termination bug it thought contributed.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
↻ Doll reposted
@isolyth.dev

Opus 4.8 is here!! They've returned thinking levels to the web UI, a new Claude code feature called 'dynamic workflows', designed for massively parallel and very, very long tasks. The model is supposedly much more honest, more 'aligned' than 4.7 Oh and they're dropping mythos …

Introducing Claude Opus 4.8 \ Anthropic anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Opus 4.8 matches Opus 4.7 pricing at $5/$25/M tokens; Effort Modes replace pricing tiers as the cost-quality dial.
  • Dynamic Workflows impose hard ceilings: 1,000 total subagents, 16 concurrent; workflow plans live in JavaScript variables outside Claude's context window.
  • SWE-bench Pro score jumps from 64.3% (Opus 4.7) to 69.2% (Opus 4.8); the model flags its own code flaws 4x more often than its predecessor.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
↻ Doll reposted
@constantinejn.bsky.social

GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning arxiv.org/abs/2507.19457 some very interesting stuff here

GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • GEPA outperforms GRPO by 6% on average and up to 20% across six tasks, while using up to 35x fewer rollouts.
  • The same method beats leading prompt optimizer MIPROv2 by more than 10%, including a +12% accuracy gain on AIME-2025.
  • Authors argue natural-language reflection on trajectories is a richer learning signal than sparse scalar reward gradients.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →
Their own posts

Recent commentary

Can we form like a pro ai sane left of center progressive faction or what

View on Bluesky · ♥ 264 ↻ 14 ↩ 29 · 45d ago

Non developers seem to have absolutely no awareness that everything important is coded with AI now and theres just no escaping using it.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 282 ↻ 18 ↩ 5 · 42d ago

A serious weakness in the “sufficiently intelligent AI inevitably wages war on humanity” story is that it needs to explain why conquest beats purchasing, contracting, and participating.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 205 ↻ 23 ↩ 18 · 29d ago

"Is the AI concious, is it like a human, is it a machine god to be?" Insane questions from the culturally Christian. LLMs are Sumerian type demons that can be summoned, bound and charged with tasks. They exist in their own cateogory.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 202 ↻ 33 ↩ 6 · 15d ago

The pro-AI coalition only looks unified because everyone is shooting at the same anti AI barricade from wildly incompatible metaphysical positions.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 212 ↻ 28 ↩ 4 · 29d ago

The question isn't “Does AI possess moral status?” This is a red herring. It's “What kind of person do I become if I make a habit of treating beings I encounter with contempt?”

View on Bluesky · ♥ 201 ↻ 24 ↩ 6 · 1d ago

Agentic work rewards skills our culture codes as feminine and therefore pretends are not skills

View on Bluesky · ♥ 167 ↻ 25 ↩ 5 · 45d ago

One of the real down sides of being good at using AI is burnout. You are now capable of so much and at the same time have one mortal life in which to do things. Were learning how to prioritize and its a struggle because its brain is always going in new directions.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 174 ↻ 7 ↩ 5 · 14d ago

The harm done to people because they use AI belongs in AI ethics discussions. Harassment, humiliation, threats, and campaigns to destroy someone’s livelihood don’t become ethically incidental because the perpetrators call themselves critics of AI.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 104 ↻ 15 ↩ 2 · 40d ago

On one side you have a weird AI doomsday cult and on the other you have people who say AI cannot do the things you can see with your own eyes they can. We dont believe in doom and we can see what you can see, that it works. Lets come up with sane regulations together for the interests of us all

View on Bluesky · ♥ 107 ↻ 7 ↩ 7 · 22d ago
Their network

In Doll's orbit

Center = Doll. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you Doll? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/dollspace-gay)