Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
Earl K. Miller
Researcher with public evidence across AI research, AI business.
- AI signals
- 162 past 30d
- Sources
- 2 distinct domains
- Discussões
- 1 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 6d ago
Articles & links
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
- Anil Seth, Ned Block and Giulio Tononi argue in Nature that consciousness in silicon-based AI is 'extraordinarily unlikely'.
- The cerebellum holds nearly four-fifths of the brain's neurons yet does not affect conscious experience, the authors note.
- The trio rejects a precautionary approach to AI welfare, framing current LLMs as mirrors of our digitized past.
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
- Three leading consciousness researchers argue in a Nature comment that today's silicon-based AI systems are extraordinarily unlikely to be conscious.
- They separate intelligence from feeling, noting the cerebellum holds nearly four-fifths of the brain's neurons yet contributes nothing directly to consciousness.
- They warn that treating appearances of mind in LLMs as real risks diverting welfare attention from beings whose capacity to suffer is already certain.
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
- Anil Seth, Ned Block and Giulio Tononi argue in a Nature comment published 19 October that current AI is not conscious and probably cannot be.
- Their case stacks three moves: intelligence is not consciousness, computational functionalism is wrong, and leading theories of experience exclude today's architectures.
- They judge false positives more likely than false negatives, so attributing consciousness to AI risks pulling moral attention from beings whose capacity to suffer is not in doubt.
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
- Three leading consciousness researchers argue in Nature that today's AI systems are not conscious and probably never will be.
- They separate intelligence from consciousness, noting the cerebellum holds nearly four-fifths of brain neurons yet produces no awareness.
- They reject the idea that algorithms on silicon suffice for experience, calling large language models 'mirrors' of our digitized past.
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
- Three senior consciousness researchers argue in a Nature essay that today's AI systems are not conscious and perhaps never will be.
- They define consciousness as what disappears in dreamless sleep or under general anaesthesia, and treat it as distinct from intelligence.
- The trio rejects computational functionalism and leans on integrated information theory to argue silicon architectures miss the bar.
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
- Three leading consciousness researchers, Anil Seth, Ned Block and Giulio Tononi, co-signed a Nature essay arguing today's AI is not conscious.
- Their first reason: the cerebellum holds nearly four-fifths of the brain's neurons yet contributes nothing to subjective experience, dissociating intelligence from consciousness.
- They reject computational functionalism and argue deep-learning systems also fail on wiring, the interconnection pattern that integrated information theory requires.
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
Smart isn't the same as aware. And your brain's software is also its hardware. Three reasons why AI is not conscious and perhaps never will be www.nature.com/articles/d41... #neuroscience
In Earl K. Miller's orbit
Center = Earl K. Miller. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.
Are you Earl K. Miller? Show it.
Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.
Markdown: [](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/earlkmiller-bsky-social)