Eryk Salvaggio
Articles & links
Live-read of the Magnifica Humanitas part two: This section starts by covering truth, work and freedom (and unspoken: communication). Figured it will probably need its own thread. www.vatican.va/content/leo-...
- Pope Leo XIV's 42,300-word Magnifica Humanitas, signed May 15 and published May 25, addresses AI as the central challenge to human dignity.
- The encyclical states AI systems are 'cultivated' not 'built' and explicitly denies they possess experience, a body, or the capacity to feel pain.
- Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah spoke at the Vatican's May 25 presentation alongside theologians and three cardinals.
Image models are not "a" model. Each component was built or integrated to solve a specific problem of computer vision — each engineered to automate a decision, each inscribing its bit of ideology into every generated image. My latest paper unpacks those decisions and what they…
- Salvaggio argues latent diffusion models function as 'neural economies' that convert social communication into commensurable vectors for commodification.
- The paper analyzes four pipeline components — CLIP, the autoencoder, U-Net, and classifier-free guidance — for embedded ideological positions.
- Exclusive focus on copyright critique risks overlooking how the model's architecture itself transfers the social sphere into commodity form.
Anthropic’s response and influence on the encyclical is most evident in the claim that “even its creators don’t understand how it works.” In June, I wrote about what that actually means & why Anthropic says it. (Written while I was in Rome, FWIW). www.techpolicy.press/the-blac…
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
“Whether AGI will arrive matters less than what waiting for it already organizes.” link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Recent commentary
This image from Anthropic goes out to the two guys on here who called me dumb for talking about stochastic flocks
The reason people like the Pope’s AI missive is because there is simply no other institution has taken the side of humanity in the humanities sense. I’m not Catholic, but I am a human who cares about the human mind and the poetics Catholics call a soul.
Would like to assert, again, that there is no conflict in suggesting that a) the user experience of LLMs and image/sound/video models have improved and that the foundational AI critique is unchanged by this AND b) the user experience of technology creates new sets of problems worthy of examination.
Thomas Mann said that "a writer is someone for whom writing is harder than it is for other people." This is a reason writers hate generative AI: people who thought writing was easy never cared what the words said, and the LLM is a typewriter for when you don't give a shit.
Trump admin told Anthropic it needs to prevent foreign nationals from accessing its Fable models. It seems it will now ask for a selfie and ID from users, with data processed by Persona Industries, funded by Peter Thiel, whose Palantir Industries runs services for ICE.
There is a rebuttal to AI crit that goes: “you are assuming there is some mysterious, unnameable essence that makes people human.” The argument is then that we must somehow show evidence; ideally, that evidence would be quantifiable
There’s sometimes a sense that if you’re researching the effects of LLMs or Diffusion Models on culture or the user then you are condoning their use and naturalizing it: I would like to remind you that scholars also study the cultural effects of crack and STDs.
People keep insisting that LLMs are not next-token predictors anymore and I think we need to clarify two vocabularies between camps.
If the AI / Human intelligence distinction seems blurry it’s because the language is identical but emerges from ultimately incomparable systems. Our presence resolves the gap and makes it seem otherwise — language is always unifying the system instead of creating space to recognize the division.
I would like Gen AI to not use all that gas & water, and to not be built on data collected through deceptive means, so I can focus more cleanly on how the unchecked capitalist cult of productivity has created a demand for lazily deployed machines and what that does to our minds and culture
In Eryk Salvaggio's orbit
Center = Eryk Salvaggio. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.