sorelle

212 trust researcher @friedler.net · 2,104 followers
Why they matter

Researcher with public evidence across Policy & governance, AI business, AI research.

AI signals
6
past 30d
Sources
5
distinct domains
Discussões
2
past 30d
Latest signal
12d ago
View every signal from sorelle →
CS prof at Haverford, Chair @acm.org U.S. tech policy, @brookings.edu nonres Senior Fellow, former White House OSTP tech policy, co-author AI Bill of Rights, research on AI and society, @facct.bsky.social co-founder formerly @kdphd 🐦 sorelle.friedler.net

Articles & links

↻ sorelle reposted
404 Media @404media.co

Human contractors are reviewing Copilot users’ prompts and uploaded images, according to internal documents obtained by 404 Media. The contractors are also bombarded with users’ requests for sexual AI images.

Humans Are Reading Copilot Prompts — And They're Horrified 404media.co
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Human contractors grading Microsoft Copilot image edits report being flooded with upskirt photos, sexualized edits of real women, and pro-anorexia content.
  • Reviewers see a user's original prompt, the uploaded photo, and two AI-generated edits, then pick the better one on gut feel.
  • Microsoft cites its terms of use for reusing customer data; Prolific, identified as one hiring firm, did not respond to 404 Media.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →
↻ sorelle reposted
@richvn.bsky.social

Everyone's talking about Pangram and other AI-detection software like GPTZero. They promise impressive accuracy at spotting AI-written text. Science journals are starting to use them. How good are they? @miryamnaddaf.bsky.social and I take a look for @nature.com 🧵 www.nature.c…

AI-detection tools have made huge leaps forward — how good are they? nature.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • NeurIPS rejected 18% of submissions to one of its tracks in June after screening them with the AI detector Pangram.
  • Pangram's technical paper reports a 0.0041% false-positive rate on English texts, with similar rates across more than 100 languages.
  • But Pangram still labels heavily AI-edited human student essays as fully human 41% of the time, per its own tests.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →

Seriously, this article contains such amazing ridiculousness. What fresh hell is this: "They'll be able to say, 'Hey, I'm student number 1234,' and then the robot will be like, 'Hey, we were talking about this yesterday, do you want to continue that conversation?" nysfocus.com…

Rural NY School To Launch Humanoid Robot Teacher nysfocus.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 3 ↻ 1 ↩ 1 · 12 from the directory shared this · 112d ago

Are you curious about the environmental impact of AI? Install the AI Impact Tracker to estimate the environmental footprint of your ChatGPT usage, including energy, water, and CO2. chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ai-im... #FAccT2026

AI Impact Tracker - Chrome Web Store chromewebstore.google.com
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • AI Impact Tracker is a new Chrome extension that quantifies the carbon, water, and energy usage tied to a user's ChatGPT activity.
  • It measures output tokens and combines them with coarse location data to model localized power grid and water resource impacts.
  • The listing shows version 1.0.1, updated June 25, 2026, three users and no ratings, with aggregate data sent to aiimpacttracker.cs.haverford.edu.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 19 ↻ 9 ↩ 2 · 2 from the directory shared this · 134d ago

Also got to pitch banning AI in schools. See also: www.techpolicy.press/schools-went...

Schools Went After Cellphones. Now It’s Time to Ban Generative AI. techpolicy.press
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • Two Brookings-affiliated scholars argue schools should ban student use of generative AI for essays, homework and coding until research establishes learning impacts.
  • They would preserve dedicated computer science and humanities courses where students study how AI systems work and critique societal effects.
  • The piece cites a 'junior-year wall' where students who leaned on AI in introductory CS courses later struggle with advanced assignments.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 1 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 2 from the directory shared this · 37d ago

I can't believe this has to be said, but we should have real human teachers caring for our kids. www.brookings.edu/articles/a-p...

A people-first vision for the future of work in the age of AI | Brookings brookings.edu
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • A Brookings essay argues US job quality was already eroding through surveillance, algorithmic scheduling, and declining autonomy before AI arrived.
  • The authors propose minimum staffing rules for schools, mid-career retraining institutions, and tripartite bodies where labor, business, and government jointly design AI at work.
  • They cite a Carnegie Mellon and UNITE HERE app for hotel guest room attendants as a working example of worker-led AI co-design.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 4 ↻ 2 ↩ 0 · 2 from the directory shared this · 113d ago
↻ sorelle reposted
Alondra Nelson @alondra.bsky.social

October 15 is the deadline to apply for a fellowship at the Institute for Advanced Study School of Social Science, including the "Understanding AI" theme year. www.ias.edu/sites/defaul...

ias.edu View on Bluesky →
↻ sorelle reposted
Alondra Nelson @alondra.bsky.social

October 15 is the deadline to apply for a fellowship at the Institute for Advanced Study School of Social Science, including the "Understanding AI" theme year. www.ias.edu/sites/defaul...

ias.edu View on Bluesky →

In sorelle's orbit

Center = sorelle. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.

Are you sorelle? Show it.

Add the Who’s Who of AI badge to your site or bio. It links back to this profile.

Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI

Markdown: [![Listed in AI Weekly's Who's Who of AI](https://aiweekly.co/modules/custom/aiweekly_whoswho/images/whoswho-badge.svg)](https://aiweekly.co/whos-who/person/friedler-net)