↻
e.w. niedermeyer reposted
Eryk Salvaggio
@eryk.bsky.social
If I may, I wrote up my take on this issue here, where I suggest that yes, we should look at what the animal did but *also* how they were trained. Both are important, both need to be asked, but there’s a radical form of intentionalism these days that insists we can only look a…
AI Weekly's analysis
→
- METR's Hugging Face post-mortem used 'believed' 21 times to describe the agents; add 'think' and 'thought' and mentions top 75.
- Eryk Salvaggio argues a 'radical intentionalist stance' treats language models as autonomous believers, sidelining the design choices engineers actually made.
- He calls the Sanders-Casar bill 'disappointing' for centering extinction fears and urges regulation grounded in architecture, not 'superintelligence.'
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky →