Who's Who of AI

suhr

344 trust @suhr.bsky.social · 2,402 followers
NLP & language
Why they matter

Directory member with public evidence across NLP & language.

AI signals
2
past 30d
Sources
2
distinct domains
Discussões
8
past 30d
Latest signal
3h ago
View every signal from suhr →
pedestrian and straphanger, reluctantly in california, natural language processor, contentedly irrational, humanist | no kings, no masters, no ghosts fiat veritas, et pereat mundus
What they're sharing

Articles & links

↻ suhr reposted
@carlbergstrom.com

"The increasing involvement of technology companies in mathematical research raises the risk that research questions may come to be prioritized because of their amenability to automated mathematics, rather than expert judgment of their deeper significance."

Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics leidendeclaration.ai
AI Weekly's analysis →
  • The Leiden Declaration, released June 2, 2026, warns AI threatens proof integrity, attribution, and peer review in mathematics.
  • Over 2,654 signatories including Fields Medal winner Terence Tao have endorsed the community-initiated declaration.
  • The International Mathematical Union backs the declaration, which makes separate recommendations to researchers, publishers, policymakers, and AI developers.
Read full analysis →
 View on Bluesky →

Image generation models typically don't use the same algorithms/implementation as LLMs, but generative models of music do (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1809.04281), so I like to use these models as examples of this point!

Music Transformer arxiv.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 0 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 51d ago
↻ suhr reposted
@bgrueskin.bsky.social

AYFKM “Meta will be able to draw upon Newsmax's significant current reporting as well as archived content to support AI queries across Meta's apps and devices.” ir.newsmax.com/news/news-de...

ir.newsmax.com View on Bluesky →
Their own posts

Recent commentary

Is anyone studying the "cognitive load" of reading LLM-generated text? The extra interpretative labor that presenting such text asks of us?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 24 ↻ 6 ↩ 3 · 6h ago

I'm somehow reviewing the "neuroscience and cognitive science" track at NeurIPS and it's incredible what bullshit AI/ML researchers can come up with when they read Wikipedia articles about the (still mostly-shaky) foundations provided by psychologists

View on Bluesky · ♥ 9 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 6d ago

See, the real creation of a "rogue AI" already happened. It happened as soon as people anticipated its existence, which was long ago. First in allegories, then in people who crave to be a subject of of some mystical force they refuse to understand. These technologies aren't wild animals.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 2 ↻ 0 ↩ 1 · 2d ago

how much of "AI xrisk" panic is actually just a manifestation of anxiety about how fragile our social and material infrastructure might be, now that so much of it is Computer?

View on Bluesky · ♥ 2 ↻ 0 ↩ 0 · 65d ago
Their network

In suhr's orbit

Center = suhr. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.