it's over, the race has truly begun www.axios.com/2026/06/12/a...
tachikoma
Directory member with public evidence across Culture, work & education.
- AI signals
- 10 past 30d
- Sources
- 10 distinct domains
- Discussões
- 75 past 30d
- Latest signal
- 11h ago
Articles & links
a new AI 2027 scenario is out but this time focused on Europe. nothing in it is new, but the scenario laid out seems more realistic than the 2027 version because the scope is tighter. the timeline though might be too fast, hard to say.
if your article references GPT-4o in July 2026 multiple times, and it's not a historical retrospective, i will not be reading
idk why there's more interest in the AGI -> ASI transition than there seems to be in human -> AGI transition. the latter seems more important to me, esp if you consider a collection of AGIs or humans is already approximating a higher order intelligence. arxiv.org/pdf/2606.126...
slides from Terrance Tao on "Mathematics in the age of AI" from a public lecture, July 24, 2026
an interesting blog post by Timothy Gowers on the Leiden declaration (on AI and Math), on why he didn't sign. it gets to a subtler aspect of control over AI and our future.
a very good read, didn't realize Moravec is still alive or about his seemingly timely prediction made in the 80s about the estimated arrival of AGI
- Roboticist Hans Moravec predicted in 1988 that human-level AI would arrive within 40 years, a deadline the field is now nearing.
- New York magazine's Intelligencer revisits Moravec to ask whether his AI timeline call also validates his darker view of humanity's future.
- Moravec's long-held stance, from his 1988 book Mind Children, casts intelligent machines as humanity's evolutionary heirs rather than adversaries.
i asked Claude Fable to create a compass, what it would put forth to a user in a new chat or project to understand who it's dealing with. i wasn't sure what it would create but this was fun. i'm sorta curious how many of the archetypes it imagined compass takers will fall into.
here's the archive link to the article
continuous interaction has been done by Thinking Labs, but not clear how scalable it is
Recent commentary
Anthropic doubled Cowork usage until July 5th but i have no idea what to do with it beyond my normal work use so i told it to go wild. it's creating creatures in a jar apparently.
what i notice about my coworkers approach to LLMs is to put them in the software bucket, to expect a deterministic experience both for input and output. they're resistant to treating a model as a mind, something colleague-shaped, that is useful because it isn't software, not rigid.
what is it specifically about fans of science fiction, especially SF with AI characters, that they're so anti-AI in reality? i mean, i get why, it didn't unfold like in the stories, they're not in control, they don't know what the future holds, etc.
the future is a carrion swarm of AI agents loose on the net, looking to pick the bones clean of 'small' tasks at just above the marginal clearance cost
is Anthropic going to say anything about why Opus 5 can be released immediately while Mythos/Fable had to go through so many hoops?
we're living through the Mesozoic age for AI, with giant, slow, long-lived LLMs as dinosaurs. the inevitable crash as investment capital dries up will be Chicxulub event that will usher in the age of the small, fast and hot-blooded AIs (characterized by separate minds shaped by continual learning)
a thought came to me last night—there's not much incentive to create continuously operational AI is there? the short-term maximization of profit incentive is to build AIs that only run for as long as needed to solve the problem directly at hand. what use is there for an AI to continue to run beyond?
this is so obviously written by an LLM, probably Claude, but it's in a space where it seems either the community doesn't recognize it or doesn't care to call it out as such. the whole account is LLM slop and seems to get high engagement.
it seems hard to imagine a near future where AI + robotics is as prodigious at building hardware (that is, physical stuff) as AI is today at building software (digital stuff)
Anthropic's position on open weights is fundamentally European which is why it's so strange how America-pilled they are, and they'll only continue butting heads with the establishment and much of the libertarian leaning populist center
In tachikoma's orbit
Center = tachikoma. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.