Casey Fiesler

Information science professor, technology ethics

information science professor (tech ethics + internet stuff) kind of a content creator (elsewhere also @professorcasey) though not influencing anyone to do anything except maybe learn things she/her more: casey.prof

Articles & links

On the first page of search results there's this recent preprint ("On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs" arxiv.org/html/2412.14...) so I gave it a skim. Interesting! Then I realized that this paper was cited in the Google AI overview... for a claim that I was pretty sure i…

On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs arxiv.org
View on Bluesky · ♥ 68 ↻ 1 ↩ 1 · 12d ago

Ever seen a news story about AI and thought “this could be an episode of Black Mirror”? We're running a research study where we ask people to imagine generative AI futures and pitch their own science fiction story. More detail at the link and please share! www.internetruleslab…

Black Mirror Survey Study — Internet Rules Lab internetruleslab.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 73 ↻ 41 ↩ 7 · 2 from the directory shared this · 13d ago

A side effect of a new department (founded 2015) is that we have very very few alumni donations. And I sometimes get the (very kind) question "how can I support you since you don't get paid for teaching random internet people about AI ethics?" Support my students instead :) bi…

giveto.colorado.edu
View on Bluesky · ♥ 31 ↻ 4 ↩ 2 · 2 from the directory shared this · 23d ago

Recent commentary

Particularly in the context of (appropriate) crackdowns on LLM-generated papers (e.g., on arXiv) and more and more tales of fabricated citations, two reminders: (1) LLMs do not "cite their sources" (2) Using an LLM to generate, complete, or fix LaTeX code can result in fabricated citations

View on Bluesky · ♥ 380 ↻ 116 ↩ 6 · 32d ago

In the "you can't make this up" category of LLM interactions... TL;DR Google Gemini claims that LLMs "often give themselves a 95%+ confidence score even when they are hallucinating" - which was itself a "hallucinated" claim - then later assigns itself 0.95 confidence in that hallucinated claim. 🧵

View on Bluesky · ♥ 389 ↻ 111 ↩ 14 · 12d ago

I saw someone referring to the booing of commencement speakers talking about AI as a tantrum from students who don’t understand technology. That made me think that I bet machine breaking was also perceived as a tantrum. Anyway, here’s some thoughts about the Luddites.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 62 ↻ 17 ↩ 3 · 31d ago

Ran into another example of the Google AI Overview misinterpreting a search term as a command. :) This is a conference acronym that I saw on a CV and didn't know what it was!

View on Bluesky · ♥ 64 ↻ 11 ↩ 5 · 9d ago

hey so if anyone wants to do the "for science!" thing and pilot/give me feedback on a (long - because I would love feedback on where to shorten) survey about AI that also involves creating science fiction... reply and I will DM you :)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 6 ↻ 3 ↩ 7 · 16d ago

Well I guess it's nice that the bots are supportive of my Black Mirror + generative AI research study...

View on Bluesky · ♥ 16 ↻ 2 ↩ 2 · 5d ago

In Casey Fiesler's orbit

Center = Casey Fiesler. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.