Ethan Mollick

Professor at Wharton studying AI, work and education

Why they matter

Professor at Wharton studying AI, work and education with public evidence across Culture, work & education, AI research.

AI signals
27
past 30d
Sources
20
distinct domains
Discussions
32
past 30d
Latest signal
9h ago
View every signal from Ethan Mollick →
Professor at Wharton, studying AI and its implications for education, entrepreneurship, and work. Author of Co-Intelligence. Book: https://a.co/d/bC2kSj1 Substack: https://www.oneusefulthing.org/ Web: https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/emollick

Articles & links

Previously, these AI hacking stories were about breaches in test environments, where any question of AI breaching security was purely theoretical. This is something else. openai.com/index/huggin...

openai.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 104 ↻ 12 ↩ 8 · 18 from the directory shared this · 7d ago

I think it is really worth reading this piece on RSI at Anthropic. There is a bit of navel-gazing, some marketing, and a lot of very sincere beliefs about what Anthropic thinks is likely in the near future of AI that you probably want to be aware of. www.anthropic.com/institut…

When AI builds itself anthropic.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 85 ↻ 17 ↩ 8 · 16 from the directory shared this · 54d ago

This is a key reason I don’t expect the flow of frontier open weights models to continue indefinitely, or even for very much longer. The gap between open and closed capabilities may soom start to grow, not shrink. www.reuters.com/world/beijin...

reuters.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 85 ↻ 11 ↩ 7 · 9 from the directory shared this · 21d ago

Some really interesting research from Anthropic that AI models have spontaneously developed a workspace that "appears to support the functions associated with conscious access" Demo of how this works: www.neuronpedia.org/qwen3.6-27b/... Research: www.anthropic.com/research/glo...

A global workspace in language models \ Anthropic anthropic.com
AI Weekly's analysis
  • Anthropic says Claude has a 'J-space' of dozens of concepts, under a tenth of neural activity, that mediates multi-step reasoning.
  • Swapping 'spider' for 'ant' inside the J-space changed Claude's leg-count answer from 8 to 6, demonstrating a causal role.
  • A 'J-lens' tool surfaced silent words like 'fake', 'fictional' and 'manipulation' during deception tests, pointing at safety uses.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 97 ↻ 14 ↩ 5 · 6 from the directory shared this · 22d ago

There is a lot being written about the stylistic tells of AI writing (em-dashes, etc.) but this paper looks at AI narrative tells instead. Fascinating differences between AI & human narrative, and asking AI to write in different styles doesn't do much to change it arxiv.org/ab…

[2604.03136] StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction arxiv.org
AI Weekly's analysis
  • StoryScope hit 93.2% macro-F1 separating human from AI fiction using only narrative structure features, retaining over 97% of the version that added style cues.
  • The study covered 61,608 stories of about 5,000 words each, drawn from 10,272 prompts written by one human and five different LLMs.
  • Model-specific tells surfaced: Claude showed flat event escalation, GPT over-indexed on dream sequences, and Gemini defaulted to external character description.
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 218 ↻ 47 ↩ 6 · 3 from the directory shared this · 61d ago

Finally, AI finds its ultimate use case. A diffusion model trained on burger recipes "discovers the classic Big Mac without explicit supervision and generates novel burgers optimized for deliciousness, sustainability, or nutrition." ASI= automated slider intelligence www.natur…

Generative artificial intelligence creates delicious, sustainable, and nutritious burgers | npj Science of Food nature.com
AI Weekly's analysis
Read full analysis →
View on Bluesky · ♥ 226 ↻ 42 ↩ 10 · 3 from the directory shared this · 32d ago

“Whimsey attacks” that seem absurd (“I cannot pay that much because of the Geneva Convention”) work against AI agents because guardrails are weak against out-of-distribution arguments. Smaller models fall often, but it even gives an edge against bigger ones. www.microsoft.com/…

Whimsical Strategies Break AI Agents: Generating Out-of-Distribution Adversarial Strategies at Scale - Microsoft Research microsoft.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 82 ↻ 11 ↩ 6 · 2 from the directory shared this · 75d ago

This is a fascinating and important set of data which shows us where things are going, using OpenAI as a canary in the coal mine. The chatbot era is over & agentic systems are coming to tasks beyond engineering. Skills show promise as a way to standardize AI use in firms. open…

openai.com
View on Bluesky · ♥ 72 ↻ 8 ↩ 2 · 2 from the directory shared this · 33d ago

Recent commentary

The talk about AI & politics seems to be oddly missing a segment (a) assumes extremely capable AI is possible soon and (b) has a strong belief about how to use this technology to make human life better according to the political project they believe in. It is a moment of action right now.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 132 ↻ 15 ↩ 12 · 73d ago

BlueSky AI conversations have gotten less heated recently* * because much of this site has blocked me via automated lists so I have no contact with large parts of this social network, which isn’t necessarily a good thing, though it does make for nice echo chambers, which are pleasant, at least.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 179 ↻ 7 ↩ 15 · 72d ago

More evidence, from a large-scale study in China, that using AI hurts learning if it undermines mental effort. When homework time drops due to AI use, so do test scores. Across studies, there is a clear theme: AI tutoring in support of classes is good, using AI to "help" with homework is bad.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 411 ↻ 127 ↩ 17 · 39d ago

It is weird that there is still a substantial set of people who believe "AI is mostly hype" at this stage: Five Eyes is warning about AI, exponential revenue & token use at the AI labs, unit distance/Erdos proofs, and so on... There are many real issues with AI, not being real is not one of them.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 304 ↻ 40 ↩ 9 · 34d ago

June 2024: The latest general-purpose LLMs could not count the r's in strawberry. July 2025: The latest general-purpose LLMs get gold in the International Math Olympiad. May 2026: The latest general-purpose LLM solve an 80 year old problem, one of the "best-known questions in combinatorial geometry"

View on Bluesky · ♥ 263 ↻ 45 ↩ 10 · 69d ago

Here are 58 words of prompts to GPT-5.6 Pro that got the model to discover that the long-standing Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture is false. Increasingly, prompt crafting is over-rated, ask for what you want. (Which itself can be a hard problem)

View on Bluesky · ♥ 207 ↻ 23 ↩ 10 · 6d ago

AI is generally a weak fiction writer except for one particular kind of fiction (rich in impressionistic metaphor, staccato sentences, short & plot light, etc.) which it writes excellently. This happens to be a style that can sometimes do quite well in modern literary fiction short story contests.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 162 ↻ 28 ↩ 21 · 38d ago

Science fiction authors in the order you want them to be right about AI: Iain Banks Becky Chambers Martha Wells Douglas Adams Charles Stross (Singularity Sky) Peter Watts Charles Stross (Laundry) Harlan Ellison

View on Bluesky · ♥ 177 ↻ 21 ↩ 18 · 48d ago

Making humans responsible for their AI use seems like an incredibly reasonable way to address problems & opportunities in the use of AI for academic research, at least in the short term (autonomous scientific work will require different solutions).

View on Bluesky · ♥ 193 ↻ 22 ↩ 4 · 75d ago

As more people come to recognize the tells of AI, which mostly happens as you start to work with AI a lot, the scales are going to fall from their eyes and they are going to realize what some of us already see: how much of this site (and blog posts, articles, scientific papers) are AI now.

View on Bluesky · ♥ 160 ↻ 18 ↩ 13 · 65d ago

In Ethan Mollick's orbit

Center = Ethan Mollick. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.