Federico Adolfi

This one👇🏻 because: 1) the cognitive and brain sciences and AI/ML have typically focused on problem solving and there’s not nearly as much discussion of how we find important problems or what makes a problem worthy of attention; 2) the paper could use more citations. link.spri…

link.springer.com

Next week I'll be at University of Göttingen, Campus Institute Data Science. Come say hi ! On Thursday I'll give a talk in the CIDAS lecture series: on the integration of interpretability theory and experiment across AI and the cognitive sciences. www.uni-goettingen.de/en/6901…

uni-goettingen.de

Doing formal/computational theory in a multidisciplinary intersection is wonderful because neuroscientists say it’s not biological enough, it’s too theoretical for AI folks, too applied for theoretical computer scientists, not empirical enough for cognitive scientists, & too formal for philosophers💫

Machine Learning books: and that’s why NETFLIX uses these POWERFUL TOOLS for RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS Netflix: our personalized selection for you is 🥁🥁🥁 the show you’ve been watching all week we think you will like it

Reviewing the slide deck for my talk today: Right, so one slide to introduce them to interpretability, one slide to give them some background on complexity, one slide to bring them all and in the darkness bi — *delete delete* never mind got a bit carried away there

Gen Xer: *publishes single paper as tenured professor with chatbot as coauthor* hi fellow kids Gen Zer: *publishes dozens of AI generated papers before grad school without disclosure* sure ok

Next week I’ll be at University of Geneva. I’ll give a talk on Wednesday on interpretability and complexity at the intersection of AI and the Cognitive/Brain Sciences. Happy to chat if you’re in the area!