Genuine question: Do we think this linked framing holds up after the explosion of AI agents? "Like catalogs and the internet, large models are part of a long history of cultural and social technologies." Are LLMs (now) really in the same category as card catalogues? www.scienc…
Laura K. Nelson
Articles & links
My spicy ghost pepper hot, but 100% genuine take: scholars in my specific subfield (sociology of culture) have been using generative AI responsibly in research since at least 2013. I'll even put a date on it: Mohr and Bogdanov, 2013. + www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
I'm really vibing with this collection of essays on the Future of Quantitative Social Science. It flat out has me buzzing. As Kevin Munger says in Chapter 14: "But AI will soon make it impossible for us to ignore the absurdity of the status quo..." rohanalexander.github.io/not…
More signals pointing in the same direction, from a Lean In survey so still not independent academics: www.forbes.com/sites/kimels...
Ok and another one 👀 @asanews.bsky.social : Where's our Task Force? We're behind the times* on this one. (*MLA. We're behind MLA) www.mla.org/About-Us/Gov...
Recent commentary
Fascinating thread. Post after post of students describing how, pre-AI, they got As on book reports and courses without reading a single book. Either this is all a bit I don't understand (very possible, I don't get social media) or we* need to really sit with how students move through HS. *Just me?
There's a genre of LLM criticism that I find so destructively unhelpful: using a single vague prompt to "analyze" data, e.g. "summarize the themes across this collection of texts," to claim "see! LLMs don't work." & it's getting published! Reviewers this is not good work pls reject it if you see it.
In Laura K. Nelson's orbit
Center = Laura K. Nelson. Left = members they follow (green edges). Right = members who follow them (blue edges). Top = mutual follows (orange edges, slightly larger). Drag any node to reposition; click to open that profile.