Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Aaron Hertzmann ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Compute & infrastructure Signal 15d ago

Meat computer brain artificial intelligence

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“I think the stakes are different in computing than it has been in neuroscience/philosophy, and the meaning of "is just a computer" differs. In neuro, it's a healthy debate between competing scientific paradigms. In computing, it's increasingly about dehuman…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 3 posts · 6d ago
Sung Kim: To those calling AI a bubble: agentic AI, the phase where AI actually performs work, is only about nine months old. We are still at the beginning.
David Marx: Oh hadn't you heard? Gary Marcus said we hit a brick wall like 8 years ago. Clearly, the past decade simply didn't happen.
Open the thread →