Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Abeba Birhane ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 15 posts · 8d ago
Abeba Birhane Jeni Tennison Anthony Moser
Matches Concern & critique
“It's so broken. One suggestion I heard was to respond to applications with a short relevant exercise. The idea is that those applying in automated ways to jobs they don't care about will fail to re…” evidence ↗
Abeba Birhane: i need to recruit for some roles and put out ads at some stage, but the process of recruiting has become so overwhelming as i know we’ll receive 100s of llm generated applications *sigh*
Jeni Tennison: It's so broken. One suggestion I heard was to respond to applications with a short relevant exercise. The idea is that those applying in automated ways to jobs they don't care about will fail to re…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 8 posts · 18d ago
Abeba Birhane Lilian Edwards Bhaskar Mitra | ভাস্কর মিত্র
Matches Concern & critique
“i’m forced to conclude those who write these policies either lack sufficient knowledge of the technology and the ai industry at large or are intentionally pushing policies that are misleading and n…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Policy & governance · 1
Abeba Birhane: been reading university/higher-ed policies on the use of genAI in education. most policies propose using genAI safely, ethically, & responsibly, which is an oxymoron. the way current genAI is devel…
Abeba Birhane: imo, you have to choose between using genAI OR cultivating fundamental educational values. you simply can’t have both 🤷🏾‍♀️
Open the thread →
3 experts · 3 posts · 9d ago
Abeba Birhane Bhaskar Mitra | ভাস্কর মিত্র Teresa Heffernan
Matches Concern & critique
“narrator: AI can't improve student learning, writing, critical thinking or communication skills. it diminishes them” evidence ↗
Abeba Birhane: narrator: AI can't improve student learning, writing, critical thinking or communication skills. it diminishes them
Bhaskar Mitra | ভাস্কর মিত্র: narrator: AI can't improve student learning, writing, critical thinking or communication skills. it diminishes them
Open the thread →