Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Agustin Lebron ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Development 14d ago
Anthropic Claude FLT formal math proof

FLT: Anthropic has beaten me to it

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Agustin Lebron Joshua Grochow

“@alexolegimas Kevin Buzzard seems to think it's pretty mechanical? I curious why you think this is IMI. https://t.co/iTX7891C57”

“And…it wasn’t even that useful (in the math sense of the word “useful”, I don’t mean like “useful useful” outside of math, it wasn’t even useful within math): xenaproject.wordpress.com/2026/09/04/f...”

Primary source xenaproject.wordpress.com ↗