Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Policy & governance
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Shared emphasis AIAL Statement on Generative AI and Scientific Integrity Policy & governance · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by AI Accountability Lab ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Signal 15d ago

AIAL Statement on Generative AI and Scientific Integrity

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Abeba Birhane Luke Stark AI Accountability Lab
3 experts discussed this · 7 posts
Abeba Birhane: we have a policy for the use of genAI at the @aial.ie. we reflect on values key to scientific integrity, such as replicability, and err on the side of not using it blogpost: aial.ie/blog/gen-ai-...…
Abeba Birhane: inspired by and thanks to @markdingemanse.net, @mjcrockett.bsky.social, @olivia.science, @irisvanrooij.bsky.social and many more
Olivia Guest: 🫶🏼
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aial.ie ↗